DONALDSONVILLE, LA —
OSHA Inspection: CETCO OILFIELD SERVICES
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of CETCO OILFIELD SERVICES in HWY 3089, DONALDSONVILLE, LA 70346 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 339124414.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CETCO OILFIELD SERVICES
- Site address
- HWY 3089
- City
- DONALDSONVILLE
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70346
- Mailing
- 2620 8TH STREET, HARVEY, LA 70058
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811310
- Employees
- 100
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4900.00 · Current $7000.00
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees in the Ammonia 3 Unit of the CF Industries Complex in Donaldsonville, Louisiana were exposed to struck-by hazards while operating the Nitrogen Supply Distribution system and its attached components. Instance 1. The employer failed to ensure the adequacy of the relief system. a) CETCO manifold rated for 6000 psi was installed in a system that could see pressures up to 10,000 psi. b) A 1" ball valve that is rated for 3600 psi was installed in a system that could see pressures up to 10,000 psi. Feasible and acceptable methods of abatement of this hazard include, but are not limited to the following: 1) All pressure vessels other than unfired steam boilers shall be protected by a pressure relief device that prevent the pressure from rising more than 10% or 3 psi, whichever is greater above the maximum allowable working pressure (UG-125(c) of ASME BPVC Section VIII - Division 1). 2) The spring in a pressure relief valve shall not be set for any pressure more than 5% above or below that for which the valve is marked, unless the setting is within the spring design range established by the valve Manufacturer or is determined to be acceptable to the Manufacturer (UG-126(c) of ASME BPVC Section VIII - Division 1). 3) The aggregate capacity of the pressure relief devices connected to any vessel or system of vessels for release of a liquid, air, steam, or other vapor shall be sufficient to carry off the maximum quantity that can be generated or supplied to the attached equipment without permitting a rise in pressure within the vessel of more than 16% above the maximum allowable working pressure when the pressure relief devices are blowing (UG-133(a) of ASME BPVC Section VIII - Division 1). 4) Design the spring so that the full lift spring compression shall be no greater than 80% of the nominal solid deflection (UG-136(a)(2) of ASME BPVC Section VIII - Division 1). 5) A pressure relief device is not required if the pressure is self-limiting and less than or equal to the MAWP of the vessel at the coincident temperature. (UG-140(a) of ASME BPVC Section VIII - Division 1). 6) The design pressure of each component in a piping system shall not be less than the pressure at the most severe condition of coincident internal or external pressure and temperature (minimum or maximum) expected during service (ASME B31.3-2006 Part 1 paragraph 301.2.1(a)). Instance 2. The employer failed to ensure the adequacy of the relieving rate. a) Employer did not ensure the relief device on the CETCO nitrogen distribution manifold was adequate to relieve the delivery rate of nitrogen supplied by the nitrogen pumper unit. Feasible and acceptable methods of abatement of this hazard include, but are not limited to the following: 1) All pressure vessels other than unfired steam boilers shall be protected by a pressure relief device that prevent the pressure from rising more than 10% or 3 psi, whichever is greater above the maximum allowable working pressure (UG-125(c) of ASME BPVC Section VIII - Division 1). 2) The spring in a pressure relief valve shall not be set for any pressure more than 5% above or below that for which the valve is marked, unless the setting is within the spring design range established by the valve Manufacturer or is determined to be acceptable to the Manufacturer (UG-126(c) of ASME BPVC Section VIII - Division 1). 3) The aggregate capacity of the pressure relief devices connected to any vessel or system of vessels for release of a liquid, air, steam, or other vapor shall be sufficient to carry off the maximum quantity that can be generated or supplied to the attached equipment without permitting a rise in pressure within the vessel of more than 16% above the maximum allowable working pressure when the pressure relief devices are blowing (UG-133(a) of ASME BPVC Section VIII - Division 1). 4) Design the spring so that the full lift spring compression shall be no greater than 80% of the nominal solid deflection (UG-136(a)(2) of ASME BPVC Section VIII - Division 1). 5) A pressure relief device is not required if the pressure is self-limiting and less than or equal to the MAWP of the vessel at the coincident temperature. (UG-140(a) of ASME BPVC Section VIII - Division 1). 6) The design pressure of each component in a piping system shall not be less than the pressure at the most severe condition of coincident internal or external pressure and temperature (minimum or maximum) expected during service (ASME B31.3-2006 Part 1 paragraph 301.2.1(a)). Iinstance 3. The employer failed to ensure adequate relief system control. a) 1" Ball valve between the CETCO nitrogen manifold and the Mercer pressure relief valve was not positively controlled to remain in the open position during operation. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is that there be no intervening stop valves between the vessel and its pressure relief device or devices, or between the pressure relief device and the point of discharge (ASME BPVC Section VIII, UG-135(d)).
Recent events (3)
- — C (S) $4900
- — F (O) $7000
- — Z (S) $4900
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811310)
CHRISTIANSBURG, VA—2026-07-09
BGIS GLOBAL INTEGRATED SOLUTION US, LLC
SEATTLE, WA—2026-07-09
WA317992010 - FLAGSHIP MANAGEMENT LLC
STATESBORO, GA—2026-07-08
TAYLOR BUILT PRODUCTS
, AK—2026-07-08
ANGUS ENTERPRISES
LOS ANGELES, CA—2026-07-08
CHILLEST INDUSTRIES LLC
More inspections in LA
LAFAYETTE, LA—2026-07-15
GULLEY'S WELDING & STEEL ERECTORS, INC.
LAFAYETTE, LA—2026-07-15
ACORREA COMPANY, LLC
LAFAYETTE, LA—2026-07-14
GULF COAST WOODWORK, L.L.C.
BELLE ROSE, LA—2026-07-14
OXYCHEM
AMELIA, LA—2026-07-10
CONRAD SHIPYARD, LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339124414.