Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DRUMMOND UNIFORM SERVICE, LTD.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DRUMMOND UNIFORM SERVICE, LTD. in 1718 6TH ST. SW, CANTON, OH 44706 (NAICS 812331). OSHA activity number 339124943.

Watch Drummond Uniform Service, LTD. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Drummond Uniform Service, LTD. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1718 6TH ST. SW
City
CANTON
State
OH
ZIP
44706
Mailing
1718 6TH ST. SW, CANTON, OH 44706
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
812331
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:      On or about June 27, 2013, the employer failed to have an eye wash station where employees dispense 12.5% hypochlorite solution, which has a pH of 12-13 and other corrosvive cleaning chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 17 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2):  The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:     As of June 27, 2013, portable fire extinguishers were available for employees to use, but initial and annual training were not provided.     Note the employer may exercise one of the following options:     1. Provide portable fire extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), meet the distribution requirements per 29 CFR 1910.157(d) (75 to the nearest extinguisher for Class A fires and 50 to the nearest unit for Class B fires), and provide training and education for all employees in the use of such equipment and the hazards associated with incipient stage fire fighting as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(g).  The other sections of 29 CFR also apply.     2. Provide extinguishers as specified in 29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1), designate certain employees to be the only employees authorized to use such equipment and require all other employees to immediately evacuate upon the sound of the fire alarm, establish this in writing in an emergency action plan as outlined in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and train/educate designated employees per 1910.157(g).  Utilizing this option exempts the employer from distribution requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157(d).     3. Establish a written fire safety policy which requires the immediate and total evacuation of employees from the workplace upon the sounding of a fire alarm signal.  This policy shall include an emergency action plan and a fire prevention plan as specified in 29 CFR 1910.38(a) and 29 CFR 1910.39(a).  Utilizing this option exempts the employer from the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.157 to include the need for providing portable fire equipment unless a specific standard requires that a portable fire extinguisher be provided (such as those requirements in 29 CFR 1910.106/107 related to the use/storage of flammable/combustible liquids).  If extinguishers are provided, but not intended for employee use, 29 CFR 1910.157(e) and (f) are still applicable (inspection, maintenance, and testing of equipment).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1030 C01 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(iv): The Exposure Control Plan was not reviewed and updated at least annually and whenever necessary to reflect new or modified tasks and procedures which affect occupational exposure and to reflect new or revised employee positions with occupational exposure:      On and before June 27, 2013, the employer failed to annually review and update their Bloodborne Pathogen Exposure Control Plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1030 D04 IV B

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(iv)(B): The employer did not ensure that employees who had contact with contaminated laundry wore protective gloves and other appropriate personal protective equipment:    On and before June 27, 2013, the employer failed to provide puncture resistant gloves to employees who sort and handle medical linen contaminated with body fluids, including but not limited to blood, feces, and urine, and which may contain sharps such as needles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1030 G02 II A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(ii)(A): The employer did not ensure that training was provided to employees with occupational exposure at the time of initial assignment to tasks where occupational exposure might take place:   On and before June 27, 2013, the employer failed to train employees who sort and handle medical linen contaminated with body fluids including but not limited to blood, feces, and urine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:     As of June 27, 2013, the employer had not performed Hazard Communication training for employees who worked with caustic cleaning and laundry chemicals including but not limited to hydrogen peroxide and 10-12% chlorine bleach.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 K06

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:   As of June 27, 2013 the employer did not provide the information in Appendix D of 1910.134 to employees who voluntarily wore dust mask style respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present, using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet:  On or about June 27, 2013, the employer failed to have a list of their hazardous chemicals included in their written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339124943.