Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SONNY MANNY'S AUTO CENTER

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of SONNY MANNY'S AUTO CENTER in 1303 UPPER FRONT STREET, BINGHAMTON, NY 13901 (NAICS 441120). OSHA activity number 339145039.

Watch Sonny Manny'S Auto Center — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sonny Manny'S Auto Center is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1303 UPPER FRONT STREET
City
BINGHAMTON
State
NY
ZIP
13901
Mailing
339 FRONT STREET, BINGHAMTON, NY 13901
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
441120
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $840.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1) Employer did not establish nor implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures when respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators were required by the employer:   a)  Upper Lot Building, on or about 6/21/13: Employer had not established a written respirator protection program when employee was required to wear full face air purifying respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1) Employees required to wear negative pressure respirators were not provided with a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator:    a)  Upper Lot Building, on or about 6/21/13: Employee required to wear a full  face air purifying respirator had not been provided with a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight fitting face piece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator face piece (size, style, model or make) was used, and at least annually thereafter:     a) Upper Lot Building, on or about 6/21/13: Employee is required to wear a full face air purifying respirator and  had not been fit tested.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k) The employer did not provide effective, comprehensive, understandable, and annual (or more often if necessary) training to employees who are required to use respirators:     a)  Upper Lot Building, on or about 6/21/13: Employee is required to wear a full face air purifying respirator and had not received respirator training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $840.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met; specifically:  1) Labeling and other forms of warning;   2) MSDS requirements for the hazardous materials known to be present at the jobsite;   3) Employee training and information.   The written program must also include:  (a) A list of all the chemicals used at the jobsite.   (b) Methods to inform employees of hazards associated with non-routine tasks.   (c) Methods the employer will use to inform any contractors employees of workplace hazards.       a) Upper Lot Building, on our about 6/21/13: A written hazard communication program was not developed for the employees who works with hazardous materials including but not limited to: Dupont Chroma Base; Dupont Chroma System Basemaker; Dupont 105 Lacquer Thinner and Dupont G2 Multimix.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical which they used:     a)Upper Lot Building, on or about 6/21/13: The employer did not have material safety data sheets for each hazardous material including, but not limited to: Dupont Chromas Base; Dupont Chroma System Basemaker; Dupont 105 Lacquer Thinner and Dupont G2 Multimix.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (2) on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area:  a)  Upper Lot Building, on or about 6/21/13: Employees were exposed to hazardous materials such as, but not limited to: Dupont Chroma Base; Dupont Chroma System Basemaker; Dupont 105 Lacquer Thinner and Dupont G2 Multimix and were not provided information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and (2).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339145039.