DECATUR, IL —
OSHA Inspection: HUSTON-PATTERSON CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HUSTON-PATTERSON CORPORATION in 156 W. WILLIAM ST., DECATUR, IL 62524 (NAICS 323110). OSHA activity number 339149635.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HUSTON-PATTERSON CORPORATION
- Site address
- 156 W. WILLIAM ST.
- City
- DECATUR
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62524
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 260, DECATUR, IL 62522
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323110
- Employees
- 65
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
21 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.36 G02
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2100.00 · Current $700.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(2): An exit access was not at least 28 inches (71.1 cm) wide at all points and the width of the exit and exit discharge was not at least equal to the width of the exit access. Employees in the Pre-Press Printing area and the Press Area were exposed to fire and smoke inhalation in the event of an emergency because exit accesses were not at least 28 inches wide at all points.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed: Employees in the Press area were exposed to fire and smoke inhalation in the event of an emergency because material was stored in the exit routes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.37 B04
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2100.00 · Current $700.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent: Employees were exposed to fire, smoke inhalation and slips trips and falls in the event of an emergency because the exit door in the Bindery Area was not marked with an exit sign.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2100.00 · Current $700.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer shall assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). If such hazards are present, or likely to be present, the employer shall: Employees working in the Pre-Press Area using vinyl food service gloves were exposed to skin irritation and the employer had not conducted a personal protective equipment hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment. The employer did not document a personal protective equipment hazard assessment. The written certification did not include the name of the person who certified that the evaluation had been performed, and the date that the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (4)
- — I $1500
- — Z $4200
- — I (S) $0
1910.138 B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(b): The employer did not base the selection of the appropriate hand protection on an evaluation of the performance characteristics of the hand protection relative to the task(s) to be performed, conditions present, duration of use, and the Employees working with Energy Elite Improved Replenisher and Developer were exposed to skin irritation and the employer had not conducted a personal protective equipment hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4900.00 · Current $1601.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: Employees performing service and maintenance on equipment were exposed to caught-in and amputation hazards and the employer had not developed and implemented a comprehensive energy control program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1601
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to Items of this section: Employees performing service and maintenance on the presses were exposed to caught-in and amputation hazards and the employer had not developed and implemented specific energy control procedures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $1167.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees: On or about May 31, 2013 an employee locked out the KBA 6 color press to change the bearings on the ink ball. The employer did not provide the employee training to ensure the energy control program was understood.
Recent events (4)
- — I $3500
- — Z $7000
- — I (S) $1167
1910.147 D03
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $933.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3): All energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment was not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source: Employees performing service and maintenance on the plate developer were exposed to ingoing nip points and the energy isolating device was not operated in a manner to isolate the equipment from the energy source.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $933
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees: Employees are exposed to in-going nip points when performing sevicing and maintenance activitie on the plate developer in the prepress area and the employer did not ensure that a lockout device was affiixed to the energy isolating device by an authorized employee.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 D06
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(6): Prior to starting work on machines or equipment that had been locked out or tagged out, the authorized employee did not verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment had been accomplished: Employees were exposed to in-going nip points when performing sevicing and maintenance activities on the plate developer in the prepress area and the employer did not ensure that the authorized employee verified that the equipment was isolated from the energy source(s).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2100.00 · Current $700.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air, that was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i., was used for cleaning purposes without effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment. An employee using compressed air for cleaning purposes was exposed to injury from blown particles and air embolism because the air pressure was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.303 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $933.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: An employee was exposed to the hazard of electrical shock in the Shipping Area because the outer insulation was frayed on the Saw's cord.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $933
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: Employees were exposed to electrical shock in the Shipping Area because suitable strain relief was not provided on the knockout outlet, which powered a light and a hand tool.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $933.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Installation and use. Listed or labeled equipment shall be installed and used in accordance with any instructions included in the listing or labeling. Employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards in the press area becasue a a 4-receptacle metal box with pre-punched knockouts was installed on the end of a flexible cord, not installed and in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $933
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.1200 F05 I
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2100.00 · Current $700.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(i): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemical(s) contained therein: Employees in the Press Department are exposed to eye, skin and respiratory irritations and the employer has not ensured that each container of hazardous chemicals was labeled, tagged or marked with the identity of the hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.1200 F05 II
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the appropriate hazard warnings: Employees in the Press Department were exposed to skin, eye and repiratory irritation while operating the presses and the employer did not ensure that each container was labeled with the appropriate hazard warning, as required by the standard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.304 F01 VIII
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $933.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(f)(1)(viii): Circuit breakers for circuits rated 600 volts, nominal, or less used as switches in 120 volt and 227 volt fluorescent lighting circuits, were not listed and marked "SWD." Employees were exposed to the hazard of electrical shock and burns when using the circuit breaker not rated for switch duty, as switches in florescent lighting circuits in the shipping warehouse.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $933
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed: Employees were exposed to hazardous energy when performing servicing and maintenance tasks on the employers equipment and periodic inspections of each energy control procedure had not been conducted at least annually, during servicing and maintenance tasks.
Recent events (4)
- — I $1000
- — Z $1400
- — I (O) $0
1910.147 F02 I
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(2)(i): When outside servicing personnel were engaged in activities in a facility, the onsite employer and the outside employer did not inform each other of their respective lockout or tagout procedures: When performing maintance on a KBA 6 color press the employer did not exchange information on their respective lockout procedures.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at HUSTON-PATTERSON CORPORATION
DECATUR, IL—2014-01-09 00:00:00
HUSTON-PATTERSON CORPORATION
View HUSTON-PATTERSON CORPORATION's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323110)
MINNEAPOLIS, MN—2026-05-20
111284 - MARTH GROUP LLC DBA ENPOINTE
GLENDALE, KY—2026-02-04
68801 - PG-GERALD LLC
PORTLAND, OR—2026-01-16
317742947 - PEP PRINTING INC
MINNEAPOLIS, MN—2025-11-18
110299 - OMEGA LITHOGRAPH INC
BELLINGHAM, WA—2025-09-05
WA317987718 - CAPITOL CITY PRESS INC
More inspections in IL
BLOOMINGTON, IL—2026-07-13
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
GRANITE CITY, IL—2026-07-13
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
DECATUR, IL—2026-07-10
TILLAMOOK ILLINOIS, LLC
NEW LENOX, IL—2026-07-10
A.D GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LLC
LOCKPORT, IL—2026-07-09
ROBERTO GOMEZ DBA ROBERTO GOMEZ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339149635.