Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DENT CENTERS HAWAII, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of DENT CENTERS HAWAII, INC. in 1372 COLBURN STREET, HONOLULU, HI 96817 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 339183402.

Watch Dent Centers Hawaii, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dent Centers Hawaii, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1372 COLBURN STREET
City
HONOLULU
State
HI
ZIP
96817
Mailing
1372 COLBURN STREET, HONOLULU, HI 96817
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1360.00 · Current $1020.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a.  On or about July 10, 2013, employees were required to wear respirators when sanding and spray painting vehicles and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program that addressed the worksite-specific procedures such as but not limited to employee medical evaluation, fit testing, and training on the use, maintenance and care of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1020
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a.  On or about July 10, 2013, employees who were required to wear NIOSH approved half-face respirators had not been provided medical evaluations prior to wearing the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a.  On or about July 10, 2013, employees who were required to wear NIOSH approved half-face respirators had not been fit tested prior to initial use of the respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:  a.  On or about July 10, 2013, employees who were required to wear NIOSH approved half-face respirators had not received respirator training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1020.00 · Current $765.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a.  On or about July 10, 2013, the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program which described how the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) would be met for employees who have exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to waxes, solvents, and spray paints.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $765
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a.  On or about July 10, 2013, the employer did not provide information and training to employees who have exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to waxes, solvents, and spray paints.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339183402.