OSHA Inspection: SOONER HOT OIL SERVICES, LLC

Issued

2014-01-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-02-18 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $3000.00

General-duty citation text

OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to thermal burns during steaming operations to clean tubing:     Nadel & Gussman Tap #2 well, Ponca City, OK: On or about July 11, 2013, the employer did not provide pre-job instructions to the crew before assigning the task of steaming tubing exposing employees to the hazard of thermal burns.

Issued

2014-01-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-02-18 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $3000.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, were not provided, used, and maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition wherever it is necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation or physical contact:    Nadel & Gussman Tap #2 well, Ponca City, OK: On or about July 11, 2013, the employer did not provide and require the use of personal protective equipment to protect the extremities of employees steaming tubing using water heated between 200 and 225 degrees exposing employees to hazards such as, but not limited to, thermal burns.

Issued

2014-01-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-02-18 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    Nadel & Gussman Tap #2 well, Ponca City, OK: On or about July 11, 2013, the employer did not complete a comprehensive hazard assessment of the workplace to determine the hazards present and the personal protective equipment needed to protect employees from identified hazards exposing employees to hazards such as, but not limited to, struck-by and contact-with.

Issued

2014-01-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-02-18 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    Nadel & Gussman Tap #2 well, Ponca City, OK: On or about July 11, 2013, the employer did not verify the required workplace hazard assessment was completed though a written certification, exposing employees to hazards such as, but not limited to, struck-by and contact-with.

Issued

2014-01-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-02-18 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    Nadel & Gussman Tap #2 well, Ponca City, OK: On or about July 11, 2013, the employer did not provide and require the use of appropriate eye and face protection by employees exposing employees to hazards such as, but not limited to, thermal burns caused by contact with liquid chemicals heated between 200 and 225 degrees.

Issued

2014-01-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-02-18 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2400.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, and where such employee's feet are exposed to electrical hazards:    Nadel & Gussman Tap #2 well, Ponca City, OK: On or about July 11, 2013, the employer did not provide and require the use of safety foot wear exposing employees to the hazard of struck-by.

Issued

2014-01-07 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-02-18 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2400.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:    Nadel & Gussman Tap #2 well, Ponca City, OK: On or about July 11, 2013, the employer did not provide and require the use of appropriate hand protection by employees exposing employees to the hazard of thermal burns.