Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: ENGINETICS AEROSPACE CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ENGINETICS AEROSPACE CORPORATION in 34000 MELINZ PARKWAY, EASTLAKE, OH 44095 (NAICS 336412). OSHA activity number 339248684.

Watch Enginetics Aerospace Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Enginetics Aerospace Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
34000 MELINZ PARKWAY
City
EASTLAKE
State
OH
ZIP
44095
Mailing
34000 MELINZ PARKWAY, EASTLAKE, OH 44095
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336412
Employees
34
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6300.00 · Current $4410.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  At the time of inspection, the company did not establish a program to protect employees involved with servicing and maintenance of machines and equipment from the unexpected energizing, start up, or release of stored energy.  Energy sources include, but are not limited to, electrical, pneuamtic, hydraulic, etc.  The company maintains and services equipment such as, but not limited to, CNC milling machines, lathes, sanders, etc.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4410
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $3150.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:      a) At the time of inspection, the Mazak Quick Turn 30  machine doors were not interlocked to prevent them from being opened during production or running of equipment.      b)  At the time of inspection, the Mazak Vertical machining cell doors were not interlocked to prevent them from being opened during production or running of equipment.   c) At the time of inspection, the Mazak Quick Turn 20  machine doors were not interlocked to prevent them from being opened during production or running of equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3150
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:     At the time of inspection, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees including, but not limited to, those who are required to wear full face tight fitting respirator when painting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:      At the time of inspection, the employees required to use half-face tight-fitting respirators, including but not limited to cleaners, had not received medical evaluations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):      At the time of inspection, employees required to use full-face tight-fitting respirators had not received a fit test
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 28 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  At the time of inspection, the emplpoyer did not have written a hazard communication program and employees were exposed to chemicals such as but not limited to; oils, lubricants, solvents, and cleaners, and paints.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339248684.