DALLAS, TX —
OSHA Inspection: GUARD-ALL BLDG. SOLUTIONS
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of GUARD-ALL BLDG. SOLUTIONS in 1011 REGAL ROW, DALLAS, TX 75247 (NAICS 332311). OSHA activity number 339335267.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GUARD-ALL BLDG. SOLUTIONS
- Site address
- 1011 REGAL ROW
- City
- DALLAS
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75247
- Mailing
- 1011 REGAL ROW, DALLAS, TX 75247
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332311
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4900.00 · Current $1920.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: This violation occurred on or about January 7, 2014, when the employer had not administered a hearing conservation program for employees exposed to noise that had exceeded an 8-hour TWA of 85 dBA, based on an 80 dB threshold. (a) A fabricator employee was exposed to continuous noise levels at 100% of the permissible 8-hour TWA. The equivalent level of 100% is approximately 90.0 dBA. Sampling was performed for 111 minutes during one shift. Zero exposure was assumed for the 369 minutes not sampled. (b) A grinder employee was exposed to continuous noise levels at 113.9% of the permissible 8-hour TWA. The equivalent level of 113.9% is approximately 90.9 dBA. Sampling was performed for 202 minutes during one shift. Zero exposure was assumed for the 278 minutes not sampled. c) A welder employee was exposed to continuous noise levels at 111.6% of the permissible 8-hour TWA. The equivalent level of 111.6% is approximately 90.8 dBA. Sampling was performed for 437 minutes during one shift. Zero exposure was assumed for the 43 minutes not sampled. d) A welder employee was exposed to continuous noise levels at 83.58% of the permissible 8-hour TWA. The equivalent level of 83.58% is approximately 88.7dBA. Sampling was performed for 230 minutes during one shift. Zero exposure was assumed for the 250 minutes not sampled. e) A sandblaster employee was exposed to continuous noise levels at 100.6% of the permissible 8-hour TWA. The equivalent level of 100.6% is approximately 90.0 dBA. Sampling was performed for 374 minutes during one shift. Zero exposure was assumed for the 106 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1920
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.1000 A02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4200.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employees were exposed to Particulate Not Otherwise regulated in Table Z-1 which is also referenced in Table Z-3 under "Inert or Nuisance Dust" in excess of 15 mg/m3 (total) as an 8-hour Time Weighted Average concentration. This violation occurred on December 27, 2014, when an employee sandblasted fabricated steel structures and was exposed to dry expendable abrasives. Dry expandable abrasives are covered under particulates not otherwise regulated-total dust substance. The employee was exposed to particulates not otherwise regulated- total dust at an 8-hour time-weighted-average (TWA) level of 91.6 mg/m3, 6.1 times the permissible exposure limit of 15 mg/m3. The exposure level was derived from samples collected for 314 minutes. Zero exposure time was assumed for the unsampled period of 166 minutes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $4200
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d): This violation occurred on December 27, 2013 in the sandblasting area, where the employer had not implemented feasible administrative or engineering controls to achieve compliance with the permissible exposure limit for particulates not otherwise regulated- total dust substance.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332311)
BERRYVILLE, VA—2026-06-26
J PEREZ METAL INC
ELEANOR, WV—2026-06-23
PARKLINE INC.
MODESTO, CA—2026-06-18
KINGSPAN INSULATED PANELS, INC.
EASTON, PA—2026-06-16
NVS MOVING & STORAGE LLC
LAKELAND, FL—2026-06-16
MID-STATE MACHINE AND FABRICATING CORP.
More inspections in TX
WICHITA FALLS, TX—2026-07-16
UNITED RENTALS, INC.
SAN MARCOS, TX—2026-07-16
CASA MECHANICAL SERVICES, LTD.
CLARKSVILLE, TX—2026-07-15
SEQUOIAS TREE EXPERT LLC
EL PASO, TX—2026-07-15
SURE STEEL
CORPUS CHRISTI, TX—2026-07-15
NORTH STAR ENERGY SOLUTIONS LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339335267.