Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JAMES F. TARANTINO

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of JAMES F. TARANTINO in 13800 N. BIRCHWOOD LN, MEQUON, WI 53097 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339409112.

Watch James F. Tarantino — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for James F. Tarantino is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JAMES F. TARANTINO
Site address
13800 N. BIRCHWOOD LN
City
MEQUON
State
WI
ZIP
53097
Mailing
N70 W13515 BRENTWOOD DR., MENOMONEE FALLS, WI 53051
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $400.00 · Current $400.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  (a)  James F. Tarantino DBA J.F. Tarantino Roofing did not provide certification on each of the cited items: Citation 2, Item 1- The employer did not develop a hazard communication program; Citation 2, Item 2- The employer did not maintain material safety data sheets for gasoline and insecticide; and Citation 2, Item 3- The employer did not provide training on the hazards of chemicals.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:      (a) The employer failed to ensure that each employee conducting roofing work at 13800 North Birchwood Lane in Mequon, Wisconsin, were protected from falling to the lower level by the use of a fall protection system.  This exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 17.6 feet.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1800
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    (a) The employer failed to ensure that each employee conducting roofing work on a residential building, were provided with a fall protection program.  This exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $2800
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii):    (a) The employer failed to ensure that each employee conducting roofing work on a residential building, were trained on fall hazard and procedures or systems to use to minimize the hazards.  This exposed employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    (a)  The employer did not develop a hazard communication program to provide employees with information on the hazardous material utilized as part of their normal work duties, such as, but not limited to; gasoline and insecticide.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    (a) The employer failed to ensure that all Material Safety Data Sheets were maintained and accessible to employee for materials such as, but not limited to; gasoline and insecticide.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    (a) The employer did not provide employees, which are exposed to hazardous materials while conducting their normal work duties, with hazard communication training for materials such as, but not limited to; gasoline and insecticide.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339409112.