Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: SPRINT SAFETY INC.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of SPRINT SAFETY INC. in CR 207 1 MILE SOUTH OF CR, FALLS CITY, TX 78113 (NAICS 541990). OSHA activity number 339428856.

Watch Sprint Safety INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sprint Safety INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SPRINT SAFETY INC.
Site address
CR 207 1 MILE SOUTH OF CR
City
FALLS CITY
State
TX
ZIP
78113
Mailing
6610 LEOPARD STREET, CORPUS CHRISTI, TX 78409
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541990
Employees
105
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2700.00 · Current $6300.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1):     The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment:    On or about September 25, 2013 and at other times prior thereto, at tis facility site, the employer failed to ensure an adequate written hazard assessment was conducted to determine what type of personal protective equipment was required to protect employees from the hazards of high pressure, scalding water used to clean a problematic Ultrafab scrubber.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $6300
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.134 D01 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6300.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): When the employer was unable to identify or reasonably estimate the employee exposure, the employer did not consider the atmosphere to be IDLH:    At a production facility in Karnes County, TX, the employer did not ensure employees tasked with conducting air sampling for hydrogen sulfide and other hazardous gases, wearing self-contained breathing apparatus when opening up the ultrafab unit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6300

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339428856.