JERSEY CITY, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: DERMATOLOGY AND DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, P.A.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of DERMATOLOGY AND DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, P.A. in 3202 KENNEDY BOULEVARD, JERSEY CITY, NJ 07306 (NAICS 621111). OSHA activity number 339439986.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DERMATOLOGY AND DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, P.A.
- Site address
- 3202 KENNEDY BOULEVARD
- City
- JERSEY CITY
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07306
- Mailing
- 3202 KENNEDY BOULEVARD, JERSEY CITY, NJ 07306
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 621111
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.36 G02
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $1800.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.36(g)(2): Exit access(es) were not at least 28 inches (71.1 cm) wide at all points. a) Exit to building hallway The door from the medical offices to the hallway could not be opened fully, reducing the width of the exit path to 17 inches where the door stuck by the hall stairs. Violation occurred on or about 10/23/13
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1800
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed: a) Exit through breakroom to rear of building The exit door from the breakroom was blocked with a garbage bin and mop. Violation occurred on or about 10/23/13
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.37 B04
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(4): Signs were not posted along the exit access indicating the direction of travel to the nearest exit and exit discharge when the direction of travel to the exit or exit discharge was not immediately apparent: a) Hallway between examination rooms There was no directional exit sign to indicate the exit to the rear of the building through the breakroom. Violation occurred on or about 10/23/13
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1030 C01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i): The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure did not establish a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure: a) Establishment The employer did not establish an exposure control plan for medical assistants potentially exposed to blood and other potentially infectious materials while working with the doctor performing skin treatments and surgeries. Violation occurred on or about 10/23/13.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1030 D02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(2)(i): Engineering and work practice controls were not used to eliminate or minimize employees exposure: a) Establishment The employer failed to use engineering controls that would eliminate or minimize exposure to blood or other potentially infectious material. Such controls include the BD Eclipse Needle, Terumo Surguard 3 Safety Hypodermic Needle or Miltex-Integra Miltex Surgical Safety Scalpel, among other controls. Violation occurred on or about 10/23/13.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1030 D04 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(d)(4)(i): The employer did not determine or implement an appropriate written schedule for cleaning or method of decontamination based upon the location within the facility, type of surface to be cleaned, type of soil present, and tasks or procedures being performed in the area: a) Establishment The employer did not have a written schedule for cleaning or method of decontamination for exam rooms with surfaces contaminated by blood or other potentially infectious material during procedures. Violation occurred on or about 11/20/13.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 F02 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2)(iv): The employer did not ensure that employees who declined to accept the hepatitis B vaccination offered by the employer signed the statement in 29 CFR 1910.1030 Appendix A: a) Establishment The employer did not have employees declining hepatitis B vaccination sign the declination statement in Appendix A. Workers were potentially exposed to blood and other potentially infectious material during skin treatments and surgeries. Violation occurred on or about 10/23/13.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1030 H01 II B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(1)(ii)(B): The medical record for an employee with occupational exposure did not include a copy of the employee's hepatitis B vaccination status, including the dates of all the hepatitis B vaccinations or any medical records relative to the employee's ability to receive vacination as required by 29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2): a) Establishment The employer did not maintain records of the hepatitis B vaccination status of medical assistants. Workers were potentially exposed to blood and other potentially infectious material during skin treatments and surgeries. Violation occurred on or about 11/20/13.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1030 G02 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $1500.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1030(g)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee with occupational exposure participated in a training program: a) Establishment The employer did not provide annual bloodborne pathogen training for medical assistants potentially exposed to blood or other potentially infectious material while working with the doctor performing skin treatments and surgeries. Violation occurred on or about 10/23/13.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $2000
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which described how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) would be met: a) Establishment The employer did not have a site-specific hazard communication program for medical assistants who worked with hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, MaxiCide Plus (3.4% glutaraldehyde) which they used to sterilize certain tools. Violation occurred on or about 10/23/13.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift: a) Establishment Safety data sheets were not available for medical assistants who worked with hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, MaxiCide Plus (3.4% glutaraldehyde) which they used to sterilize certain tools. Violation occurred on or about 10/23/13.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) Establishment Medical assistants were not trained on hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, MaxiCide Plus (3.4% glutaraldehyde) which they used to sterilize certain tools. Violation occurred on or about 10/23/13.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 621111)
WEST SACRAMENTO, CA—2026-07-15
COMMUNICARE+OLE SALUD CLINIC
MARQUETTE, MI—2026-07-09
FOREFRONT DERMATOLOGY SC
MONMOUTH, OR—2026-07-08
317744740 - NORTHWEST HUMAN SERVICES INC
COOKEVILLE, TN—2026-06-30
MIDDLE TENNESSEE EYE ASSOCIATES, PLC
SAN RAFAEL, CA—2026-06-30
MARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC
More inspections in NJ
PERTH AMBOY, NJ—2026-07-16
ENGLERT INC.
RIDGEFIELD, NJ—2026-07-16
COLORITE PLASTICS COMPANY
BERLIN, NJ—2026-07-16
URUS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
GLASSBORO, NJ—2026-07-15
GLASSBORO WATER & SEWER DEPARTMENT
FLANDERS, NJ—2026-07-15
TRI-STATE QUIKRETE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339439986.