Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JORGE A. ROCHA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JORGE A. ROCHA in 13501 RACEWAY DRIVE, FORT WORTH, TX 76162 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339478786.

Watch Jorge A. Rocha — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jorge A. Rocha is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JORGE A. ROCHA
Site address
13501 RACEWAY DRIVE
City
FORT WORTH
State
TX
ZIP
76162
Mailing
408 PLEASANT MEADOWS LANE, DALLAS, TX 75217
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.404 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites:     On or about November 8, 2013 and times prior thereto, electrical equipment in use by employees was not provided with ground fault circuit interrupters, exposing the employees to electric shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.403 B02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification:    On or about November 8, 2013, and times prior thereto the employer did not ensure electrical equipment used at a commercial construction site was used as per the equipment's listed and labeling:    1. At the front North West side outside of the construction project, a job made extension cord, in use, was made using an extension cord and a metal junction box with knockouts to supply electrical power to employees performing Stucco installation work inside of the construction project.     2. At the front North West side outside of the construction project a 120V power strip was used outside to supply power to battery chargers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.405 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.405(b)(2): In energized installations, each outlet box did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:  On or about November 8, 2013, and times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure employees who were performing Stucco installation at a commercial construction project were using electrical outlets with covers exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:    On or about November 8, 2013, and times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure employees who were performing Stucco installation at a commercial construction project were using an electrical extension cord that was not provided with strain relief exposing employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339478786.