Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DINI HERNANDEZ CARPENTRY INC.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of DINI HERNANDEZ CARPENTRY INC. in 68 BROOK ST., CROTON ON HUDSON, NY 10520 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339479990.

Watch Dini Hernandez Carpentry INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Dini Hernandez Carpentry INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
68 BROOK ST.
City
CROTON ON HUDSON
State
NY
ZIP
10520
Mailing
92 PALMER AVE., STAMFORD, CT 06902
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $400.00 · Current $400.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer did not certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  location: entire site on or about: 2/25/14  a) The employer did not certify abatement for citation 1 item 5a (scaffold safety training) and citation 1 item 5b (fall protection training).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 13 instances 13 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  location: entire site on or about: 11/4/13  a) Employees, working below roofing activities and suspended loads, were not wearing hard hats.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.200 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.200(g)(2): All traffic control signs or devices used for protection of construction workers did not conform to Part VI of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (AMUTCD"), 1988 Edition, Revision 3, September 3, 1993, FHWA-SA-94-027 or Part VI of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Millennium Edition, December 2000, FHWA, which are incorporated by reference:  Location: Roadway IFO 68 Brook St. On or about: 11/4/13  a) Employees were in the road while cleaning up, during roofing actiivities. There were no traffic control signs or devices used to protect the employees from vehicular traffic.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold were not protected by a personal fall arrest system:   location: side of building, addition area on or about: 11/4/13  a) An employee, engaged in roofing work from a ladder jack scaffold, was not protected from falling by a personal fall arrest system. The employee was exposed to a fall of 16 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 9 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): "Roofing work on Low-slope roofs." Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs, with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width (see Appendix A to subpart M of this part), the use of a safety monitoring system alone [i.e. without the warning line system] is permitted:   location: roof on or about: 11/4/13  a) Employees, engaged in roofing activities, were not using any means of fall protection. The employees were exposed to a fall of 25 1/2 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  location: entire site on or about: 11/4/13  a) An employee was working from a ladder jack scaffold. The employee was not provided with scaffold safety training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 9 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who was exposed to fall hazards:  Location: entire site On or about: 11/4/13  a) Employees, exposed to a fall hazards while engaged in roofing work, were not provided with fall protection training.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339479990.