Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: WEST-PAK INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of WEST-PAK INC in 4111 PLATINUM WAY, DALLAS, TX 75237 (NAICS 322211). OSHA activity number 339507154.

Watch West-Pak INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for West-Pak INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
WEST-PAK INC
Site address
4111 PLATINUM WAY
City
DALLAS
State
TX
ZIP
75237
Mailing
4111 PLATINUM WAY, DALLAS, TX 75237
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
322211
Employees
16
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $840.00 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from the recognized hazards of being struck-by and/or crushed-by machinery and/or equipment which were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:        This violation was discovered on November 13, 2013, at West-Pak, Inc. facility located at 4111 Platinum Way, Dallas, Texas; where employees were exposed to struck-by and/or crushed-by hazards while operating an electric overhead chain hoist with a spreader beam attached. The spreader beam did not have the rated load legibly marked on its main structure or on a tag attached to its main structure where it was visible.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.22 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2400.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(b)(2): Permanent aisles and passageways were not appropriately marked:       The employer did not ensure permanent aisles and passageways were appropriately marked. This violation occurred on or before November 13, 2013, where employees working throughout the facility were exposed to tripping hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $480.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:       The employer does not ensure that suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body are provided within the work area for immediate use. This violation was observed on November 13, 2013; where maintenance and sheathing employees use chemicals and were not provided suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body within the work area for immediate use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $480
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.184 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $840.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(1):  Alloy steel chain slings did not have permanently affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity, and reach:      This violation was observed on November 13, 2013, at West-Pak, Inc. located at 4111 Platinum Way, Dallas, Texas 75237; where the employer did not ensure that alloy steel chain slings had affixed durable identification stating size, grade, rated capacity and reach.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.184 E02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(2)(i): Hooks, rings, oblong links, pear shaped links, welded or mechanical coupling links or other attachments did not have a rated capacity at least equal to that of the alloy steel chain with which they are used or the sling was not used in excess of the rated capacity of the weakest component.:    This violation occurred on November 13, 2013, where the employer did not ensure that hook links had a rated capacity at least equal to that of the alloy steel chain with which they were used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $840.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:       The employer does not ensure that guards are provided for machines in the shop area. This violation was observed on November 13, 2013; where maintenance supervisor used various types of machines in the machine shop exposed point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.    a) Fan blower located in the Rewind Department;    b) Black & Decker Valve Refacer grinder located in the Rewind Department.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $840
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.219 E03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):          The employer does not ensure that all motors had guards installed over rotating belts. This violation was observed on November 13, 2013; where employee working in the sheeting department was exposed to inclined belts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(2): Each service, feeder and branch circuit, at its disconnecting means or over current device, was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:      The employer does not ensure that feeders and branch circuits were legibly marked to indicate its purpose. This violation was observed on November 13, 2013; where employees were not aware of the machine disconnect at the feeder and branch circuit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339507154.