Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: TIM MACK

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TIM MACK in 711 EAST STREET, MIDDLETOWN, CT 06457 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339522138.

Watch TIM Mack — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for TIM Mack is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TIM MACK
Site address
711 EAST STREET
City
MIDDLETOWN
State
CT
ZIP
06457
Mailing
47 CHALKER ROAD, DURHAM, CT 06422
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  Location: 711 East Street, Middletown, CT.  The employer did not ensure that his employees were wearing safety glasses/goggles to protect them from the struck by hazard from nails being tacked into the roof from an air-powered nail gun.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502.  Location: 711 East Street, Middletown, CT.  The employer did not ensure that employees who were working on a 6 in 12 pitch roof and at least eight feet above a lower level were protected from falling by a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system or an alternative fall protection measure nor did the employer demonstate that providing one of these above mentioned systems created a greater hazard and implemented a fall protection plan.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  Location: 711 East Street, Middletown, CT.  The employer did not develop a written fall protection program for employees to use and reference that explained fall hazards, the ability to recognize these hazards and the means to minimize them.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339522138.