Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
3,913,242Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: FORBES MANAGEMENT LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FORBES MANAGEMENT LLC in 5703 HOBART STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA 15217 (NAICS 531110). OSHA activity number 339524241.

Watch Forbes Management LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Forbes Management LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5703 HOBART STREET
City
PITTSBURGH
State
PA
ZIP
15217
Mailing
6236 FIFTH AVENUE SUITE 105C, SHADYSIDE, PA 15232
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
531110
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1020.00 · Current $765.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: (Construction Reference 1926.103)   a) On or about December 27, 2013 - at 5717 Hobart Street, Apartment 23, Pittsburgh, PA 15217 - The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program.  Employees voluntarily wore a MSA half mask respirator with P100 filters while removing cabinets and a decorative beam during remodeling.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $765
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.134 E06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(6): The employer did not medically determine an employee's ability to wear a respirator:   a) On or about December 27, 2013 - at 5717 Hobart Street, Apartment 23, Pittsburgh, PA 15217 - The employer did not medically determine if a laborer wearing a MSA half mask respirator voluntarily while removing cabinets and a wooden beam was able to do so.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1101 F01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(1)(i): Where exposure monitoring was required under 29 CFR 1926.1101, the employer did not perform monitoring to determine accurately the airborne concentrations of asbestos to which employees were or potentially were exposed:  a) In Apartment Six, on or about December 10, 2013 - The employer did not determine airborne concentrations of asbestos to which employees potentially were exposed when an employee removed a cabinet and a decroative wood beam next to the kitchen.  Caulking material behind the cabinet contained 2% Chrysotile asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1101 F02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i): The employer failed to ensure that the exposure assessment was conducted in time to comply with requirements which are triggered by the exposure data or the lack of a negative exposure assessment:  a) In Apartment Six, on or about December 10, 2013 - The employer did not conduct an exposure assessment when an employee removed a cabinet and a decroative wood beam next to the kitchen.  Caulking material behind the cabinet contained 2% Chrysotile asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1101 I01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(i)(1): The employer did not provide and require the use of protective clothing, such as coveralls or similar whole-body clothing, head coverings, gloves, and foot coverings for each employee exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos that exceed the time weighted average and/or excursion limit in 29 CFR 1926.1101(c) or for which a required negative exposure assessment was not produced:  a) In Apartment Six, on or about December 10, 2013 - The employer did not provide protective clothing when an employee removed a cabinet and a decroative wood beam next to the kitchen.  Caulking material behind the cabinet contained 2% Chrysotile asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.1101 K02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(2)(i): Before work subject to this standard began, the building and/or facility owner(s) did not determine the presence, location and quantity of asbestos containing material (ACM) and/or presumed asbestos containing material (PACM) at the worksite pursuant to 29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(1):  a) In Apartment Six, on or about December 10, 2013 - The employer did not determine the presence, location, and quantity of asbestos containing material.  An employee removed a cabinet and a decroative wood beam next to the kitchen.  Caulking material behind the cabinet contained 2% Chrysotile asbestos.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339524241.