2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17
Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025

OSHA Inspection: OKULEY HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of OKULEY HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING INC. in 10300 INDUSTRIAL STREET, HOLLAND, OH 43528 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 339528929.

Watch Okuley Heating & AIR Conditioning INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Okuley Heating & AIR Conditioning INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10300 INDUSTRIAL STREET
City
HOLLAND
State
OH
ZIP
43528
Mailing
50 WEST SYLVANIA AVENUE, TOLEDO, OH 43612
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238220
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.62 D01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air (30 ug/m3) calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA):    a) On or about December 19, 2013, the employer failed to conduct initial air monitoring to determine if employees were exposed to lead at or above the action level. Employees were exposed to hazards associated with lead exposures while instaling and performing maintenance on duct work inside Jonson Controls, Inc.'s facility.    Abatement extended to June 16, 2014  			AVD amended to read as follows:  On or about December	19, 2013, the employer failed to conduct initial air monitoring to determine if employees were exposed to lead at or above the action level in a lead-regulated area at Johnson Controls facility while installing and performing maintenance on duct work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.62 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1591

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not collect personal samples representative of a full shift, including at least one sample for each job classification in each work area, either for each shift or for the shift with the highest exposure level:    a) On or about December 19, 2013, the employer failed to conduct initial air monitoring for each job classification in each work area to determine employee exposures to lead while installing and performing maintenance on duct work at various locations including but not limited to, chemset chambers, formation area, pasting area, and at AGM Line #10 inside Johnson Controls, Inc. Employees were exposed to hazards associated with lead exposures.    AVD amended to read as follows:  On or about December	19, 2013, the employer failed to conduct initial air monitoring for each job classification in each lead-	regulated area at Johnson Controls, Inc. to determine employee exposures to lead while installing and performing	maintenance on duct work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:     a) On or about December 19, 2013, the employer failed to provide medical evaluations to those employees who were required to wear 3M Versaflo powered air purifying respirators while installing duct work in lead contaminated areas of Johnson Controls, Inc.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.62 D02 V B

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v)(B): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment as required under 29 CFR 1926.62(d) and determined actual employee exposure, the employer did not provide employees performing the tasks described in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(2)(iii), and (d)(2)(iv) with appropriate personal protective clothing and equipment in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.62(g):  a) On or about December 19, 2013 the employer failed to implement protective measures until a lead exposure assessment had been completed in that the employer did not assure employees wore personal protective clothing. Employees were exposed to hazards associated with lead exposures while assembling duct work in the formation area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.62 G01 I

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.62(g)(1)(i): The employer did not provide, at no cost to the employee, and ensure that the employee used appropriate protective work clothing and equipment that prevented contamination of the employee and the employee's garments, such as, but not limited to coveralls or similar full-body work clothing.  a) On or about December 19, 2013 the employer failed to assure employees wore full-body protective clothing at a time when lead exposure was unknown. Employees were exposed to hazards associated with lead exposures while assembling duct work in the formation area in that employee's clothing was exposed to lead contamination.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339528929.