Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: THUNDERBIRD OF LATHAM LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of THUNDERBIRD OF LATHAM LLC in 833 NEW LOUDON RD, LATHAM, NY 12110 (NAICS 721110). OSHA activity number 339531683.

Watch Thunderbird OF Latham LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Thunderbird OF Latham LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
833 NEW LOUDON RD
City
LATHAM
State
NY
ZIP
12110
Mailing
833 NEW LOUDON RD, LATHAM, NY 12110
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
721110
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4500.00 · Current $2700.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    (a) On or about 12/23/2013, at facility, for the housekeepers working with Para N-Brite containing hypochlorite solution, PX-70 containing sodium hydroxide, VM 5 Softener containing glacial acetic acid, Booster Plus, containing sodium hydroxide, Comet, containing calcium hydroxide, and corrosive Para Sour RR containing hydrofluosilicic acid.  The employer did not enforce the use of personal protective equipment for the protection of the extremities such as but not limited to, safety glasses.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2700
  • — C (S) $4500
  • — Z (S) $4500

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3600.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.138(a): Employer did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands are exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasions; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:    (a) On or about 12/23/2013, at facility, for the housekeepers working with Para N-Brite containing hypochlorite solution, PX-70 containing sodium hydroxide, VM 5 Softener containing glacial acetic acid, Booster Plus, containing sodium hydroxide, Comet, containing calcium hydroxide, and corrosive Para Sour RR containing hydrofluosilicic acid.  The employer did not enforce the use of personal protective equipment for the protection of the extremities such as but not limited to, gloves.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $3600
  • — Z (S) $3600

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2700.00 · Current $1620.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c):  Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    (a) On or about 12/23/2013, at facility, for the housekeeping employees using corrosive Booster Plus containing sodium hydroxide.  An eye wash station was not immediately available for use in the event of eye contact.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1620
  • — C (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.334 A02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2700.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i): Portable cord and plug connected electric equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket):     (a) On or about 12/23/2013, in the housekeeping closet, for the housekeepers that use the vacuum cleaner, the electrical cord that powers the vacuum had insulation damage,
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.1030 C01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6300.00 · Current $3780.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(c)(1)(i):  The employer having employee(s) with occupational exposure as defined by paragraph (b) of this section did not established a written Exposure Control Plan designed to eliminate or minimize employee exposure:     a) On or about 12/23/2013, at facility, for housekeeping employees with occupational exposure to potentially infectious material.  Employer did not implement an exposure control plan.     Abatement Note:     Exposure Control Plan includes all elements required by the OSHA bloodborne pathogens standard :       1) Determination of employee exposure   2) Universal precautions  3) Engineering and work practice controls  4) Personal protective equipment  5) Housekeeping   6) Regulated waste for liquid and sharps  7) Laundry  8) Labels and signs  9) Hepatitis B vaccination   10) Post-exposure evaluation and follow-up   11) Communication of hazards to employees and training   12) Recordkeeping- sharps injury log   13) Procedures for evaluating circumstances surrounding exposure incidents
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $3780
  • — C (S) $6300
  • — Z (S) $6300

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2700.00 · Current $1620.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:     (a) On or about 12/23/2013, at facility, housekeeping employees work with hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, Para N-Brite containing hypochlorite solution, PX-70 containing sodium hydroxide, VM 5 Softener containing glacial acetic acid, Booster Plus, containing sodium hydroxide, Comet, containing calcium hydroxide, and corrosive Para Sour RR containing hydrofluosilicic acid. Employees were not provided with information and training on the hazards of the chemicals they work with or are exposed to in their work area.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1620
  • — C (S) $2700
  • — Z (S) $2700

1910.1200 H03 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, including an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employees can obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:   (a) On or about 12/23/2013, at facility, housekeeping employees work with hazardous chemicals such as, but not limited to, Para N-Brite containing hypochlorite solution, PX-70 containing sodium hydroxide, VM 5 Softener containing glacial acetic acid, Booster Plus, containing sodium hydroxide, Comet, containing calcium hydroxide, and corrosive Para Sour RR containing hydrofluosilicic acid.  Employees were not provided with information and training on the hazards of the chemicals they work with or are exposed to in their work area.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339531683.