OSHA Inspection: PIER 1000 LLC

Issued

2014-02-04 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-03-24 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1200.00 · Current $840.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):  A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  Pier 1000 Marina, employees were required to wear tight fitting air purifying respirators while performing recreational boat maintenance and repair and a written respiratory protection program had not been established.

Issued

2014-02-04 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-03-24 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Pier 1000 Marina, employees were required to wear tight fitting air purifying respirators while performing recreational boat maintenance and repair, and the employer had not provided medical evaluations to determine the employees' ability to use a respirator.

Issued

2014-02-04 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-03-24 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested:  Pier 1000 Marina, employees were required to wear tight fitting air purifying respirators while performing recreational boat maintenance and repair, and the employer did not ensure that employees were fit tested prior to using respirators.

Issued

2014-02-04 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-03-24 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide respirator training that would ensure each employee could demonstrate knowledge of items in section (i)-(vii) of this part:   Pier 1000 Marina, employees were required to wear tight fitting air purifying respirators while performing recreational boat maintenance and repair , and the employer failed to ensure employees were provided with training.

Issued

2014-02-04 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-03-24 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1200.00 · Current $840.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.179(b)(5): Crane(s) with more than one hoisting unit did not have the rated load marked on each hoisting unit or load block:  Pier 1000 Marina, Marine Travelift, Model # 60AMO, S/N 1525778 did not have rated load markings on each hoisting unit or load block exposing employees to struck against, struck by, caught between or under hazards associated with launch and recovery of boats using the marine travel lift.

Issued

2014-02-04 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-03-24 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1600.00 · Current $1120.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  Pier 1000 Marina, Maintenance shop, Sears / Craftsman 15 inch drill press was not guarded, exposing employees to a struck by, caught in hazard.

Issued

2014-02-04 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-03-24 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2000.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   In the Maintenance Shop, the employer did not have essential elements of a hazard communication program including:  written program, list of hazardous materials, and employee training.

Issued

2014-02-04 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-03-24 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:  (a) In the Maintenance Shop, the employer could not provide an SDS for Interlux Paste Wood Filler.  (b) In the Maintenance Shop, the employer could not provide an SDS for Aqua-clean 1255 Blue.

Issued

2014-02-04 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-03-24 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:  Pier 1000 Marina, the employer did not re-evaluate Powered Industrial Truck Operator performance.  Employees were certified at five year intervals.

Issued

2014-02-04 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-03-24 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.179(m)(1): A certification record which includes the date of inspection, the signature of the person who performed the inspection and an identifier for the ropes which were inspected were not being kept on file where readily available to appointed personnel:  Pier 1000 Marina, Marine Travelift,  employer did not maintain a written certification record for running rope inspections conducted monthly.

Issued

2014-02-04 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-03-24 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1915.152(b): The employer did not assess its work activity to determine whether there were hazards present, which necessitate the employees use of personal protective equipment.  Pier 100 Marina, employer did not conduct PPE hazard assessments. Employees were exposed to: flying debris, point of operation hazards, struck by and crushed by hazards.

Issued

2014-02-04 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-03-24 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1915.502(a): A written fire safety plan was not developed and implemented by the employer that covered all of the actions necessary to ensure the employees safety in the event of a fire.    Pier 1000 Marina, employer failed to develop and implement an adequate fire safety plan that covered all of the actions necessary to ensure employees safety in the event of a fire.