KENOSHA, WI —
OSHA Inspection: JURADO CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JURADO CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 10916 75TH ST., KENOSHA, WI 53142 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 339593188.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JURADO CONSTRUCTION, LLC
- Site address
- 10916 75TH ST.
- City
- KENOSHA
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53142
- Mailing
- 1308 SUPERIOR ST., RACINE, WI 53404
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. (a) The employer did not ensure that a safety program was implemented in the company. The employees were conducting siding work on pump jack scaffolds and were exposed to fall hazards and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s): (a) The employer did not ensure that worksite inspections were conducted. The employees were conducting siding work on pump jack scaffolds and were exposed to fall hazards and stuck-by hazards
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $400.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using head protection when working near and under personnel, material, and equipment. The employees were exposed to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $400
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.451 B05 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): The end of a platform greater than 10 feet in length extended over its support more than 18 inches and the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilivered end. (a) The employer did not ensure that a platform greater than 10' in length did not extend beyond 18" over its support, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1926.451 B07
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(7): On scaffolds where platforms are overlapped to create a long platform, the overlap did not occur only over supports: (a) The employer did not ensure that an overlapped platform was over a support, exposing employees to fall hazards and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. (a) The employer did not ensure that poles for pump jack scaffolds was secured at the bottom and other points as necessary, exposing employees to hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: (a) The employer did not ensure that a pump jack scaffold was supported by a firm foundation, exposing employees to struck-by hazards and fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: (a) The employer did not ensure that fall protection was used when working on pump jack scaffolds, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 G04 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(iv): Midrails were not installed at a height approximately midway between the top edge of the guardrail system and the platform surface: (a) The employer did not ensure that mid-rails were used on pump jack scaffolds, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were trained in recognizing fall hazards and implementing fall protection when working from scaffolds, exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. (a) The employer did not ensure that a competent person erected a system of pump jack scaffolds. Employees were conducting siding work and were exposed to struck-by hazards and fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
OXFORD, OH—2026-07-13
R&R SIDING LLC
WINSTON SALEM, NC—2026-07-10
161522 - MS SIDING LLC
SLINGER, WI—2026-07-10
DYLAN MATTHEW SHELLEY LLC
WINSTON SALEM, NC—2026-07-09
161514 - ALPHA OMEGA CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC
ATLANTA, GA—2026-07-09
ESV CONSTRUCTION LLC
More inspections in WI
MUSCODA, WI—2026-07-10
SCOT INDUSTRIES, INC
FRANKLIN, WI—2026-07-10
EDGE BROADBAND SOLUTIONS LLC
APPLETON, WI—2026-07-10
LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
KIMBERLY, WI—2026-07-10
ENRIQUE RESENDIC
SLINGER, WI—2026-07-10
DYLAN MATTHEW SHELLEY LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339593188.