Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
3,913,242Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: BLAST CRAFT SERVICE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BLAST CRAFT SERVICE, INC. in 750 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, SLINGER, WI 53086 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 339596199.

Watch Blast Craft Service, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Blast Craft Service, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
750 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE
City
SLINGER
State
WI
ZIP
53086
Mailing
750 INDUSTRIAL DRIVE, SLINGER, WI 53086
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327991
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1020.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.94(a)(5)(i): The employers did not use only respirators approved by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) under 42 CFR part 84 to protect employees from dust produced during abrasive-blasting operations:      (a)     While performing the blasting booth touch up work employees blasting on granite were wearing negative pressure half-face piece respirators with a helmet and a light duty fabric hood.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.107 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1020.00 · Current $612.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(1): Spray booths were not substantially constructed of steel, securely and rigidly supported, or of concrete or masonry except that aluminum or other substantial noncombustible material may be used for intermittent or low volume spraying:      (a)     The touch up booth had a ceiling constructed of plywood.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $612
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1360.00 · Current $816.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    (a)     The employee using the supplied air respirator, North model 7700 half-face piece while painting the metal cabinets, had not been given a fit test.      (b)     The employee using the negative pressure half-face piece respirator while performing sand blasting touch up work had not been given a fit test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $816
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.134 G01 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1020.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:    (a)     The employee wearing the North 7700 supplied-air respirator with a half face piece had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the respirator and his face.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1020.00 · Current $714.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:     (a)     Employees used the compressed air from the short length of air hose that had the ball valve attached and the air pressure was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. and was measured at 85 p.s.i. to 90 p.s.i.    (b)     Employees used the standard air nozzle and the air pressure was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. and was measured at 90 p.s.i.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $714
  • — Z (S) $1020

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1360.00 · Current $680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:    (a)     There were no material safety data sheets for the Fleet Farm Old 55 clear hardener, the Fleet Farm Old 55 Gloss Dark Ford Gray and the DTM alkyd gloss industrial enamel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $680
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2040.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    (a)     Employees were not given training on new chemicals used to paint the metal cabinets such as Fleet Farm Old 55 clear hardener, the Fleet Farm Old 55 Gloss Dark Ford Gray and the DTM alkyd gloss industrial enamel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2040

1910.94 A03 I E 2

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.94(a)(3)(i)(e)(2): Doors on blast-cleaning rooms were not operable from both inside and outside, except that where there was a small operator access door, the large work access door may be closed or opened from the outside only:   (a)     The doors on the blast-cleaning rooms used a slide bolt that was not operable from inside the blast-cleaning room.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339596199.