OSHA Inspection: JAMES W. MCCLELLAN & ASSOCIATES, INC.

Issued

2014-04-01 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-04-18 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4500.00 · Current $2250.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a. Machine Shop- Employees operating a Vectrax lathe and a TRAK K3 EMX vertical milling machine were not protected from severe lacerations and amputations where rotating parts were not guarded.

Issued

2014-04-01 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-04-18 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4500.00 · Current $2250.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:    a. Site- Employees voltage testing and assembling electrical equipment were provided with safety-related work practice training from the employer.

Issued

2014-04-01 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.333(a): Safety-related work practices were not employed to prevent electric shock or other injuries resulting from either direct or indirect electrical contacts, when work was performed near or on equipment or circuits which were or could be energized:  a. Site- An employee assembling control circuits in an energized control panel operating at 220 volts was not protected from electric shock where the control panel was not de-energized and locked out while the work was performed.

Issued

2014-04-01 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-04-18 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.333(b)(2)(i): The employer did not maintain a written copy of the procedures outlined in paragraph (b)(2) of 29 CFR 1910.333 and did not make it available for inspection by the Assistant Secretary of Labor and his or her authorized representatives:  a. Site- The employer failed to maintain written lock out/tag out procedures where employees are exposed to contact with de-energized electrical parts.

Issued

2014-04-01 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-04-18 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4500.00 · Current $2250.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:    a. Site- Employees voltage testing were not protected from electric shock and burns where the employer failed to provide personal protective equipment for the hands, face, and body.

Issued

2014-04-01 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-04-25 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:  a. Site- The employer failed to obtain written approval to use fork extensions with a Clark ECS27 forklift.