Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: LOPEZ FLOORING SERVICES INC.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of LOPEZ FLOORING SERVICES INC. in 4601 CALUMET AVE., MANITOWOC, WI 54220 (NAICS 238330). OSHA activity number 339638926.

Watch Lopez Flooring Services INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lopez Flooring Services INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4601 CALUMET AVE.
City
MANITOWOC
State
WI
ZIP
54220
Mailing
6523 S. KOLIN AVE, CHICAGO, IL 60629
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238330
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.602 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.602(c)(1)(ii): Modifications or additions affecting the safe operation of the equipment were  made without the manufacturer's written approval: Note: If such modifications or changes were made, the capacity, operation, and maintenance instruction plates, tags, or decals should have been changed accordingly.  On 3/7/14, an employee was operating a RT forklift with a carpet pole attachment for which there was no corresponding load chart to inform the operator of the change in capacity.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.602 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.602(d): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph 29 CFR 1910.178(l):   On and before 3/7/14, employees had not been trained by the employer in the safe operation of forklifts as evidenced by:  a) Inspections were not done to identify visible defects in the equipment.  b) The operator did not recognize broken headlights as a reason to remove the forklift from service.  c) The operator did not know using the seatbelt was required.  d) The operator did not know the capacity of the forklift with or without the attachment.  e) The operator did not know the attachment needed to be secured to the forks or backrest.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339638926.