Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JAMMAL ENGINEERING INC.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of JAMMAL ENGINEERING INC. in 1403 N HOWARD AVE, TAMPA, FL 33607 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 339664963.

Watch Jammal Engineering INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jammal Engineering INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1403 N HOWARD AVE
City
TAMPA
State
FL
ZIP
33607
Mailing
1910 W. KENNEDY BLVD., TAMPA, FL 33606
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236220
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and guardrail supports such that the space between adjacent units, and the space between the platform and the uprights is no more than 1 inch (2.5 cm) wide, and the employer could not demonstrate that a wider space was necessary.  (a) At the site employees were performing weatherization repairs while exposed to a fall hazard on a scaffold that was missing planks on the 12' and 18' level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  (a) At the site, employees performing weatherproofing on and around windows were exposed to a 12' fall hazard on a scaffold without mid-rails.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces shall not be used as a means of access.   (a) At the site, employees were performing weatherproofing on and around windows were exposed to fall hazard on a scaffold at the 12' and 18' levels while using the cross braces as a means of access.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(1): Each employee on a scaffold was not provided with additional protection from falling hand tools, debris, and other small objects through the installation of toe boards, screens, guardrail systems, or through the erection of debris nets, catch platforms, or canopy structures that contain or deflect the falling objects.  For falling objects too large, heavy or massive to be contained or deflected, the employer did not place and secure such potential falling objects away from the edge of the surface from which they could fall.  (a) At the site, toe boards were not installed on the  12' and 18' high platforms exposing above employees walking and workers below to a struck by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.454 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(c): The employer had reason to believe that an employee lacked the skill or understanding needed for safe work involving the erection, use or dismantling of scaffolds, and the employer did not retrain such employee so that the requisite proficiency was regained:   (a) At the site, where a scaffold was used, employees were exposed to struck by and fall hazards, in that, scaffold lacked ladder access, toe boards, mid-rails and planking.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339664963.