MOSINEE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: CENTRAL WISCONSIN AVIATION INC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CENTRAL WISCONSIN AVIATION INC in 400 CWA DR, MOSINEE, WI 54455 (NAICS 488119). OSHA activity number 339667321.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CENTRAL WISCONSIN AVIATION INC
- Site address
- 400 CWA DR
- City
- MOSINEE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54455
- Mailing
- 400 CWA DR, MOSINEE, WI 54455
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 488119
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.67 C02 V
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and a lanyard attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: a) On and prior to April 8, 2014, a body belt or body harness with lanyard was not available to employees working in the basket of the De-Icing Truck.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) The employer had not developed a written hazard communication program. An effective hazard communication program includes, but is not limited to, the following: 1. Labeling of workplace containers containing chemicals. 2. Maintaining Material Safety Data Sheets or Safety Data Sheets for chemicals employees use or are exposed to during the course of their employment. 3. Maintaining a list of hazardous chemicals in the workplace. 4. Training of employees on the hazards of the chemicals they are using. 5. Procedures to be followed when employees are assigned work tasks which require the usage of hazardous chemicals the employee does not use on a routine basis.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $720
- — Z (S) $1200
1910.1200 F06 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(i): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(i) through 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(v): a) Spray bottles of degreaser were not labeled with the hazards of its contents.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: a) The employer had not provided hazard communication training to employees on the hazardous chemicals used during the fueling and routine maintenance of aircraft.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.26 C02 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.26(c)(2)(iv): Ladders were not maintained in a good usable condition at all times: a) Repaired ladders were not returned to manufacturer specifications. The repaired ladders were available for employee usage.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): a) The employer had not evaluated the work tasks performed by employees including, but not limited to refueling, de-icing and aircraft maintenance, to determine if the provided personal protective equipment was appropriate for the work tasks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: a) Employees were not evaluated every three years for aircraft tug and forklift operation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 488119)
SAINT CLOUD, MN—2026-07-14
111588 - STC AVIATION INC
ARLINGTON, VA—2026-06-25
METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS AUTHORITY
JAMAICA, NY—2026-06-17
AGI- CARGO BUILDING 77A
JAMAICA, NY—2026-06-17
AGI- CARGO BUILDING 77A
EAST ELMHURST, NY—2026-06-16
AGI LLC- LGA GROUND
More inspections in WI
WAUSAU, WI—2026-07-16
MIRON CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.
ELROY, WI—2026-07-15
WABASH NATIONAL SERVICES, L.P.
SUSSEX, WI—2026-07-15
KINGS SUPERIOR CONSTRUCTION LLC
DELAVAN, WI—2026-07-15
TERONOMY BUILDERS, INC.
DELAVAN, WI—2026-07-15
A. GOMEZ CARPENTRY, INC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339667321.