Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CENTRAL WISCONSIN AVIATION INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CENTRAL WISCONSIN AVIATION INC in 400 CWA DR, MOSINEE, WI 54455 (NAICS 488119). OSHA activity number 339667321.

Watch Central Wisconsin Aviation INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Central Wisconsin Aviation INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
400 CWA DR
City
MOSINEE
State
WI
ZIP
54455
Mailing
400 CWA DR, MOSINEE, WI 54455
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
488119
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.67 C02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.67(c)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and a lanyard attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:    a) On and prior to April 8, 2014, a body belt or body harness with lanyard was not available to employees working in the basket of the De-Icing Truck.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a) The employer had not developed a written hazard communication program.    An effective hazard communication program includes, but is not limited to, the following:  1. Labeling of workplace containers containing chemicals.  2. Maintaining Material Safety Data Sheets or Safety Data Sheets for chemicals employees use or are exposed to during the course of their employment.  3. Maintaining a list of hazardous chemicals in the workplace.  4. Training of employees on the hazards of the chemicals they are using.  5. Procedures to be followed when employees are assigned work tasks which require the usage of hazardous chemicals the employee does not use on a routine basis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 F06 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(i): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(i) through 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(v):  a) Spray bottles of degreaser were not labeled with the hazards of its contents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) The employer had not provided hazard communication training to employees on the hazardous chemicals used during the fueling and routine maintenance of aircraft.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.26 C02 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.26(c)(2)(iv): Ladders were not maintained in a good usable condition at all times:  a) Repaired ladders were not returned to manufacturer specifications. The repaired ladders were available for employee usage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  a) The employer had not evaluated the work tasks performed by employees including, but not limited to refueling, de-icing and aircraft maintenance, to determine if the provided personal protective equipment was appropriate for the work tasks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:    a)  Employees were not evaluated every three years for aircraft tug and forklift operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339667321.