PANAMA CITY, FL —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE MASONRY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE MASONRY in 4905 CHRISTY LANE LOT 6, PANAMA CITY, FL 32405 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 339670879.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE MASONRY
- Site address
- 4905 CHRISTY LANE LOT 6
- City
- PANAMA CITY
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32405
- Mailing
- 940 DAWES ROAD LOT 54, MOBILE, AL 36695
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.25 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, debris was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures: a. On or about June 4, 2014, debris was not kept clear near and under the 3-buck high scaffold system, exposing the employees to trip hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets: a. On or about June 4, 2014, the employee working underneath other employees on the scaffold system was not wearing a hard hat, exposing himself to head injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $1200
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4900.00 · Current $4900.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): a. On or about June 4, 2014, each working level was not fully planked, exposing the employees to a 19.5 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4900
1926.451 C02
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames, or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation: a. On or about June 4, 2014, the scaffold frames did not have screw jacks, exposing the employees to collapsing hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, sturcure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used: a. On or about June 4, 2014, the 3-buck high scaffold system did not have a ladder, the employees climbed the scaffold rungs as a means to access and egress from the scaffold system, exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 H02 II
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(h)(2)(ii): A toeboard was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below: a. On or about June 4, 2014, toeboards were not erected along the edge of the platform, exposing the employee to head injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $4900.00 · Current $4900.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level: a. On or about June 4, 2014, employees working from a 3 buck high scaffold system was not protected from falling up to 19.5 feet by the use of a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system or any other type of fall protection method was being used.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4900
More inspections at JOSE MASONRY
ST. LOUIS, MO—2010-12-03 00:00:00
JOSE MASONRY
ANN ARBOR, MI—2004-12-29 00:00:00
JOSE MASONRY
DEARBORN, MI—2001-09-07 00:00:00
JOSE MASONRY
CANTON, MI—1997-05-21 00:00:00
JOSE MASONRY
View JOSE MASONRY's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
RENO, NV—2026-07-16
DC MASONRY
WINNETKA, IL—2026-07-15
CHICAGO STUCCO CO.
LODI, NJ—2026-07-15
J & O MASONRY CONTRACTORS
DORAVILLE, GA—2026-07-14
SUDLOW CONCRETE, INC.
FLAGLER BEACH, FL—2026-07-14
PLANET DESIGN SERVICES, INC.
More inspections in FL
MARIANNA, FL—2026-07-16
BRANNON BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
LAKELAND, FL—2026-07-16
SOUTHERN MILLING & LUMBER, INC.
OAKLAND PARK, FL—2026-07-16
PKB CABINETRY
LAKELAND, FL—2026-07-16
ELIJAH WHOLESALE, LLC.
TAMPA, FL—2026-07-16
VALENCIA WHOLESALE, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339670879.