Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: DESIRED WALL SYSTEMS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of DESIRED WALL SYSTEMS in 400 MEDFORD AVE, PATCHOGUE, NY 11772 (NAICS 238390). OSHA activity number 339710113.

Watch Desired Wall Systems — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Desired Wall Systems is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
400 MEDFORD AVE
City
PATCHOGUE
State
NY
ZIP
11772
Mailing
145 RIVERSIDE AVE, MASTIC BEACH, NY 11951
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238390
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $960.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    a) Worksite - Employees were working under areas where objects such as, but not limited to, power/hand tools and roofing materials could potentially fall. Employees were not wearing hard hats; on, or about 04/21/2014.        Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $960
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):     a) Worksite, South - Employees were working on a scaffold at the heights of approximately 12 feet. The scaffold platform had three planks, leaving half the distance between uprights without planks; on or about 04/21/2014.      Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:      a) Worksite, South - Employees were working on a scaffold at the heights of approximately 12 feet. Mud sills and baseplates were sinking into the ground; on or about 04/21/2014.      Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.    a) Worksite, South - Employees working on a scaffold system accessed upper levels by climbing cross bracing; on, or about, 04/21/2014.      Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.    a) Worksite, South - Employees were working on a scaffold at the heights of approximately 12 feet without being protected from falls. The employee was operating without a personal fall arrest system or guardrails; on or about 04/21/2014.             Note: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to submit abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.    a) Worksite, South - Employees were working on a scaffold at the heights of approximately 12 feet without being protected from falls. Personal falls arrest systems or guardrails were not used. The employees were not trained to recognize relative hazards; on or about 04/21/2014.              Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met (Construction Reference: 1926.59):  a) Worksite, South - Employees at the work site conduct finish work using materials such as, but not limited to, polymer-modified Portland cement base coat for stucco finishes. A written hazard communication program was not in place; on, or about, 04/21/2014.    Note: In addition to abatement certification, the employer is required to submit abatement documentation for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.     ABATEMENT NOTE:    The written Hazard Communication Program must include descriptions of how the following program elements, required by this regulation, will be developed, implemented, and conveyed to the employer's employee(s) who are exposed to hazardous materials:          a.   Labeling and other forms or warning:               Labels shall include at least the identity of the hazardous            chemical(s), the appropriate hazard warnings, the target organs,            and the name and address of the chemical manufacturer, importer or other responsible party;          b.   A list or inventory of all hazardous materials known to be present in the            workplace must be compiled and be maintained as part of the employer's            written Hazard Communication Program;          c.   Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs) for all materials used by            employee(s) in the workplace must be maintained and readily available            all employee(s) on all shifts.          d.   The employer's Hazardous Materials Information and Training Program            must be based upon the employer's written Hazard Communication            Program.  The training for employee(s) must include at least:  Methods and observation that may be used to detect the presence            or release of hazardous chemicals in the work area.                       The physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area.               The measures employee(s) can take to protect themselves, such as,            specific procedures, appropriate work practices, emergency            procedures, and personal protective equipment to be used.            The details of the employer's Hazard Communication Program            including an explanation of the labeling systems used, Material            Safety Data Sheets and how employees can obtain and use the            appropriate hazard information;          e.   Methods used to inform employees of the hazards associated with non            routine tasks must also be addressed in the employer's written program;            and          f.   The employer's written Hazard Communication Program must be            made available upon request.          For Multi Employer Work places, the employer's Written Hazard Communication       Program must also specifically address how:          a.   Material Safety Data Sheets for each hazardous material on the job            site will be provided to other employers in the event the other            employer's employee(s) may be exposed to these materials.          b.   The methods the employer will use to inform other employer(s) of            any precautionary measures that need to be taken to protect            employee(s) during normal operating conditions and in foreseeable            emergencies.          c.   The methods the employer will use to inform the other employer(s)            of the labeling system used in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that material safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift:  a) Worksite, South - Employees at the work site conduct masonry activity using materials such as, but not limited to, polymer-modified Portland cement base coat for stucco finishes. Material safety data sheets were not available; on, or about, 04/21/2014.    Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Worksite, South - Employees at the work site conduct masonry activity using materials such as, but not limited to, polymer-modified Portland cement base coat for stucco finishes. A training program was not in place; on, or about, 04/21/2014.   Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:   a) Worksite, South - Employees at the work site conduct finish work using materials such as, but not limited to, polymer-modified Portland cement base coat for stucco finishes.  Employees were operating without having been informed with regard to the company labeling system, safety data sheet(s) or how to obtain appropriate hazard information; on, or about, 04/21/2014.   Note: The employer is required to submit abatement certification for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339710113.