Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

CARUTHERSVILLE, MO —

OSHA Inspection: SOUTHERN TREE CARE

Foreign inspection · Safety discipline

At a glance

On , OSHA opened a foreign safety inspection of SOUTHERN TREE CARE in 1190 E. HIGHWAY 84, CARUTHERSVILLE, MO 63830 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 339744104.

Watch Southern Tree Care — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Southern Tree Care is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.

Where did this inspection happen?

Establishment
SOUTHERN TREE CARE
Site address
1190 E. HIGHWAY 84
City
CARUTHERSVILLE
State
MO
ZIP
63830
Mailing
710 HIGHLAND STREET, CARUTHERSVILLE, MO 63830

What kind of inspection was it?

Inspection type
Foreign (L)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B

When did the case open and close?

Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded

Establishment context

NAICS code
238990
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

Citations

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.21 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.21(b)(1): The employer did not provide hazard recognition training to exposed employee(s):  At the job site, the employer did not provide exposed employee(s) with hazard recognition training in the following areas:  a/  That a documented engineering survey was required, what subjects it contained, and that it needed to be posted on the job site.  b/  That the exterior walls of the structure were required to be braced when exposed employee(s) were required to work adjacent to them.    c/  That no employee was to work adjacent to exterior walls with loosened masonry.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.100(a):   Employee(s) working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    a/  At the job site, employee(s) performing mechanical demolition work adjacent to exterior walls with unstable masonry were not wearing hard hats.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.850 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.850(a): Prior to permitting employees to start demolition operations, an engineering survey was not made, by a competent person, of the structure to determine the condition of the framing, floors, and walls, and possibility of unplanned collapse of any portion of the structure. The employer did not have in writing evidence that such a survey has been performed:    a/  At the job site, the employer did not perform an engineering survey prior to the commencement of demolition operations.  No written evidence was available.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.850 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.850(b): When employees were required to work within a structure to be demolished which has been damaged by fire, flood, explosion, or other cause, the walls or floor were not shored or braced:    a/  At the job site, employee(s) working on foot or operating a Caterpillar Skid Steer, m/n 247, s/n 77821, were exposed to a serious struck-by/unplanned collapse hazard posed by the unsupported north and west walls belonging to the structure being demolished.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.859 G

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.859(g): During demolition, continuing inspections by a competent person were not made as the work progresses to detect hazards resulting from weakened or deteriorated floors, or walls, or loosened material. No employee shall be permitted to work where such hazards exist until they are corrected by shoring, bracing, or other effective means:  a/  At the job site, the employer did not have a competent person perform continuing inspections of the demolition work. Employee(s) working on foot or operating a Caterpillar Skid Steer, m/n 247, s/n 77821, were adjacent to the unsupported north and west masonry walls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)

More inspections in MO

Source

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339744104.