Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: JAMES RICHARDSON TRUCKING, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of JAMES RICHARDSON TRUCKING, INC. in 23801 BYERS RD, BOSCOBEL, WI 53805 (NAICS 484121). OSHA activity number 339750895.

Watch James Richardson Trucking, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for James Richardson Trucking, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
23801 BYERS RD
City
BOSCOBEL
State
WI
ZIP
53805
Mailing
23801 BYERS RD, BOSCOBEL, WI 53805
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Records only (C)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
484121
Employees
35
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 F05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): Chemical manufacturers, importers, or distributors did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals leaving the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1200:    On or about May 1, 2014, chemical containers at the facility were not properly labeled to indicate chemical name and hazards present.    Improperly labeled chemicals include, but are not limited to:  parts solvent, anti-freeze, hydraulic oil, and windshield wash.    Abatement documentation required per 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.132 D01

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4200.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    On or about May 1, 2014, the employer did not perform a PPE hazard assessment of the various job hazards to which employees are exposed on a daily basis.    Abatement documentation required per 29 CFR 1903.19(d).    James Richardson Trucking was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.132(d)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 280556, citation number 2, item number 1a and was affirmed as a final order on May 30, 2012, with respect to a workplace located at 23801 Byers Rd, Boscobel, WI 53805.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $2100
  • — Z (R) $4200

1910.132 D02

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  On or about May 1, 2014, the employer did not verify through written certification that a PPE hazard assessment had been performed.  Abatement documentation required per 29 CFR 1903.19(d).  James Richardson Trucking was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.132(d)(2), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 280556, citation number 2, item number 1b and was affirmed as a final order on May 30, 2012, with respect to a workplace located at 23801 Byers Rd, Boscobel, WI 53805.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $0
  • — Z (R) $0

1910.1200 E01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5600.00 · Current $2800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    On or about May 1, 2014, the employer did not have a written hazard communication program for chemicals used by employees on a daily basis.  Chemicals include, but are not limited to:  anti-freeze, degreaser, window cleaner, and brake fluid.    Abatement documentation required per 29 CFR 1903.19(d).    James Richardson Trucking was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.1200(e)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 280556, citation number 1, item number 2a and was affirmed as a final order on May 30, 2012, with respect to a workplace located at 23801 Byers Rd, Boscobel, WI 53805.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $2800
  • — Z (R) $5600

1910.1200 H01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about May 1, 2014, the employer did not provide hazard communication training to employees who are exposed to hazardous chemicals during the course of their various job duties.  Chemicals include, but are not limited to:  anti-freeze, degreaser, window cleaner, and brake fluid.  Abatement documentation required per 29 CFR 1903.19(d).  James Richardson Trucking was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.1200(h)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 280556, citation number 1, item number 2b and was affirmed as a final order on May 30, 2012, with respect to a workplace located at 23801 Byers Rd, Boscobel, WI 53805.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $0
  • — Z (R) $0

1910.37 B05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g. closet):  On or about May 1, 2014, a red door leading to the basement from the truck garage was not marked to indicate that it was not an emergency exit route.   Abatement documentation required per 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View JAMES RICHARDSON TRUCKING, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339750895.