Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PERFECT PRECISION MACHINING, LTD

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PERFECT PRECISION MACHINING, LTD in 920 CLAY ST, AKRON, OH 44302 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339758658.

Watch Perfect Precision Machining, LTD — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Perfect Precision Machining, LTD is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
920 CLAY ST
City
AKRON
State
OH
ZIP
44302
Mailing
920 CLAY ST, AKRON, OH 44302
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1700.00 · Current $850.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:    At the time of inspection, the employer did not provide standard railings at the doors in the shop.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $850
  • — Z (S) $1700

1910.178 L

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l): Operators were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks:    At the time of inspection, the employer did not provide a training program to employees, in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks including, but not limited to the Allis Chalmers FPL 40 .
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.179 F06 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.179(f)(6)(iii): All floor, remote and pulpit operated crane bridge drives were not provided with a brake or non-coasting mechanical drive:    At the time of inspection, the employer failed to ensure the bridge brakes on the 5 ton overhead crane were operable.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.179 J02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): Overhead cranes were not inspected for defects on a daily basis for items including but not limited to; all functional operating mechanisms for maladjustment, deterioration or leakage of air or hydraulic systems and hooks:  At the time of inspection, the employer did not ensure each employee operating an overhead crane conducted frequent inspections prior to use. Cranes were operated a few times a week and no inspections were conducted by operators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 J03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): A complete periodic inspection of crane(s) had not been conducted in the past 12 months:  At the time of inspection, the employer did not ensure a complete periodic inspection was conducted on overhead crane.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.179 L01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.179(l)(1): A preventive maintenance program based on the crane manufacturer's recommendations was not established:  At the time of inspection, the employer did not implement a preventative maintenance program for the overhead crane based on the manufacturers recommendations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2400.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    At the time of inspection, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected with the following:    a) chuck guards and;    b) chip guards    while operating the lathes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2400

1910.1200 H03 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  At the time of inspection, the employer did not train employees that are potentially exposed to hazardous chemicals on the revised Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) label elements and the new format and types of information on each section of the Safety Data Sheets (SDS).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339758658.