AKRON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: PERFECT PRECISION MACHINING, LTD
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PERFECT PRECISION MACHINING, LTD in 920 CLAY ST, AKRON, OH 44302 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339758658.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PERFECT PRECISION MACHINING, LTD
- Site address
- 920 CLAY ST
- City
- AKRON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44302
- Mailing
- 920 CLAY ST, AKRON, OH 44302
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $1700.00 · Current $850.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards: At the time of inspection, the employer did not provide standard railings at the doors in the shop.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $850
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.178 L
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l): Operators were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks: At the time of inspection, the employer did not provide a training program to employees, in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks including, but not limited to the Allis Chalmers FPL 40 .
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.179 F06 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1600.00 · Current $800.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(f)(6)(iii): All floor, remote and pulpit operated crane bridge drives were not provided with a brake or non-coasting mechanical drive: At the time of inspection, the employer failed to ensure the bridge brakes on the 5 ton overhead crane were operable.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $1600
1910.179 J02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): Overhead cranes were not inspected for defects on a daily basis for items including but not limited to; all functional operating mechanisms for maladjustment, deterioration or leakage of air or hydraulic systems and hooks: At the time of inspection, the employer did not ensure each employee operating an overhead crane conducted frequent inspections prior to use. Cranes were operated a few times a week and no inspections were conducted by operators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.179 J03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(3): A complete periodic inspection of crane(s) had not been conducted in the past 12 months: At the time of inspection, the employer did not ensure a complete periodic inspection was conducted on overhead crane.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.179 L01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(l)(1): A preventive maintenance program based on the crane manufacturer's recommendations was not established: At the time of inspection, the employer did not implement a preventative maintenance program for the overhead crane based on the manufacturers recommendations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: At the time of inspection, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected with the following: a) chuck guards and; b) chip guards while operating the lathes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200
- — Z (S) $2400
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: At the time of inspection, the employer did not train employees that are potentially exposed to hazardous chemicals on the revised Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) label elements and the new format and types of information on each section of the Safety Data Sheets (SDS).
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
CAMBRIDGE, MN—2026-07-09
111567 - VISION MACHINE INC
SAINT PAUL, MN—2026-07-09
111558 - ST PAUL MACHINE - DESIGN INC
EVERETT, WA—2026-07-07
WA317991968 - ONOMAC INDUSTRIES INC
SOUTH DEERFIELD, MA—2026-07-07
VISION MACHINING INC
LAKEVILLE, MN—2026-07-02
111518 - KD HOLDING COMPANY INC DBA MEDFAB MANUFACTURING CO
More inspections in OH
OXFORD, OH—2026-07-13
R&R SIDING LLC
CONNEAUT, OH—2026-07-13
CONTINENTAL STRUCTURAL PLASTICS
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
HARRISON, OH—2026-07-10
WEBER FAMILY FARMS LLC
JEFFERSON, OH—2026-07-10
LAKE CITY PLATING LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339758658.