Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JUAN CARLOS ROMEREZ

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of JUAN CARLOS ROMEREZ in 10057 KALINDA LANE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63128 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339791618.

Watch Juan Carlos Romerez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Juan Carlos Romerez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JUAN CARLOS ROMEREZ
Site address
10057 KALINDA LANE
City
SAINT LOUIS
State
MO
ZIP
63128
Mailing
3100 EVERPLACE RD., MARYLAND HEIGHTS, MO 63043
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:(a)(LOCATION)(SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)   At the site, where an employee was exposed to getting struck on the head by debris falling from the roof, while working on the ground level, was not provided protective helmet(Hardhat).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.(a)(LOCATION)(IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)(DESCRIBE HAZARD(S) WHERE NECESSARY)  At the site, where employees used nail guns to affix roofing shingles on a residential building were not provided eye protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a)  NOTE TO CSHO: USE THIS OPTION ONLY IN CASES WHERE THE INFEASIBILITY/GREATER HAZARD EXCEPTION IS NOT IN ISSUE.  At the site, on 05/22/2014, employees removing and replacing the roof shingles, of a residential building were not protected from falling.  No other means of fall protection was used.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  At the site, where workers were engaged on roofing repair of a residential building, the workers were not given training on the hazards of falling and how to minimize the hazard. On or 05/22/2014, workers were observed on the roof with no fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339791618.