Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CATACEL CORP.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CATACEL CORP. in 785 N. FREEDOM STREET, RAVENNA, OH 44266 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 339795478.

Watch Catacel Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Catacel Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CATACEL CORP.
Site address
785 N. FREEDOM STREET
City
RAVENNA
State
OH
ZIP
44266
Mailing
785 N. FREEDOM STREET, RAVENNA, OH 44266
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i):  Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:      On or about June 5, 2014, machine-specific lockout/tagout procedures were not developed for the heater/dryer oven on the Ogre Line.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i):  The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:                                                                                                           On or about June 5, 2014, periodic inspections were not conducted of lockout/tagout procedures necessary to control the hazardous energy of machines such as, but not limited to, the Insert Coater and Lindberg Belt Furnace.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L04 II E

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(ii)(E): Refresher training was not provided to forklift operators after a condition changed that affected safe operation of the truck:    On or about June 5, 2014, the employer did not provide refresher training to employees after moving to a different facility and when new conditions arose that affected safe operation of the truck.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    On or about June 5, 2014, the Ogre Line coiler guide in the manufacturing area used to guide metal to the coil was not properly guarded. Employees were exposed to the ingoing nip points when operating and setting up the equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.219 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting:    On or about June 5, 2014, the employer did not guard the rotating shaft with a protruding end on the Ogre Coiler located in the manufacturing department. The shaft was 2.5 feet from the floor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:   On or about June 5, 2014, the workplace hazard assessment had not been put in writing and certified with the person conducting the evaluation and the dates the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

CENTRIA

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339795478.