Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: PLASTEK INDUSTRIES

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of PLASTEK INDUSTRIES in 12350 BELCHER ROAD UNIT 5G, LARGO, FL 33773 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 339795643.

Watch Plastek Industries — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Plastek Industries is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PLASTEK INDUSTRIES
Site address
12350 BELCHER ROAD UNIT 5G
City
LARGO
State
FL
ZIP
33773
Mailing
12350 BELCHER ROAD UNIT 5G, LARGO, FL 33773
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.215 A04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:    (a) In the shop employees were  exposed to a struck by hazard, in that, the opening between the tool rest and the grinding wheel was 0.25 inch wide.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.219 C04 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(4)(i): Unguarded projecting shaft end(s) did not present a smooth edge and end and projected more than one half the diameter of the shaft:  (a.) At the establishment while using the Baldor buffing machine employees were exposed to a caught on hazard, in that , the spindle on the right side of the machine were not guarded by non-rotating caps or sleeves, on or about 06/05/2014. The shaft end which projected 1" did not have a non-rotating or safety cap.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $600.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a) In the area of the production table employees used hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to the methylene chloride and methyl methacrylate that are present in the MC Bond Cement. The employer has not established a hazard communication program for exposed employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $600
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.1200 F10

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(10): The employer did not ensure that workplace labels or other forms of warnings were legible   (a) In the work office area the employees were using hazardous chemicals in containers that were not labeled and exposed the health hazards such as but not limited to eye irritation and allergic skin reactions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.38 A

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.38(a): 29 CFR 1910.38(a)(1):  The emergency action plan required by 29 CFR 1910.157(a) or (b) when the employer has elected to partially or totally evacuate the workplace in the event of a fire emergency, or required by 29 CFR 1910.160(c)(1), did not cover the designated actions that the employer or employees must take to ensure employee safety from the fire and other emergencies:    a) At the company the employer did not have an emergency action plan when employees fully evacuate in case of emergency, on or about June 5, 2014
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years:   (a) At site employees were exposed to a struck by hazard, in that, the employer did not ensure that employees who operated the forklift were re-evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339795643.