SAINT LOUIS, MO —
OSHA Inspection: E.L. AUSTIN CO.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of E.L. AUSTIN CO. in 4215 E. PAGE AVENUE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63113 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 339802639.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- E.L. AUSTIN CO.
- Site address
- 4215 E. PAGE AVENUE
- City
- SAINT LOUIS
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63113
- Mailing
- 3750 SULLIVAN AVENUE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63107
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238220
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: a/ At the job site on or about 06/11/14, exposed employees were not instructed in or familiar with the requirements of Part VI of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (AMUTCD"), 1988 Edition, Revision 3, September 3, 1993, FHWA-SA-94-027 or Part VI of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Millennium Edition, December 2000, FHWA, as it applied to warning signs and barricades.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $240.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a/ At the job site, one employee observed emptying water from inside an open trench was not wearing a hard hat. The spoil pile was located adjacent to the east side of the trench.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $240
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $240.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a/ At the job site, one employee using a hack saw to cut a metal water pipe was not wearing safety glasses or the equivalent.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $240
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.200 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.200(g)(1): Construction areas were not posted with legible traffic signs at points of hazard: a/ At the job site on or about 06/11/14, specifically the westbound lane of E. Page Avenue, no traffic signs were posted at the advanced warning area, transition area, or the activity area of the two-day long work zone where employees were replacing pipe in an excavation. The dump truck and trackhoe were both located in the inner-most westbound lane.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $200
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.200 G02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.200(g)(2): All traffic control signs or devices used for protection of construction workers did not conform to Part VI of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (AMUTCD"), 1988 Edition, Revision 3, September 3, 1993, FHWA-SA-94-027 or Part VI of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Millennium Edition, December 2000, FHWA: a/ At the job site on or about 06/11/14, a sufficient number of traffic cones and/or barriers were not were not posted at the activity area along on-coming lane to guide motorists away from the parked dump truck and trackhoe. The work zone existed along the westbound lane of E. Page Avenue. Employees were replacing pipe in an excavation. Heavy traffic was observed driving past this job site while the work was progressing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.651 C02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $280.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(c)(2): A stairway, ladder, ramp or other safe means of egress was not located in trench excavations that were four (4) feet (1.22 m) or more in depth so as to require no more than 25 feet (7.62 m) of lateral travel for employees: a/ At the job site, one employee was using a plastic bucket to remove standing water from inside of the trench. The trench measured approximately 35"W X 55"D X 89"L. Neither a ladder, ramp, nor other safe means of egress was provided.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $280
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.651 H01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $280.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(h)(1): Employees worked in excavations in which there was accumulated water, or in excavations in which water was accumulating. Adequate precautions were not taken to protect employees against the hazards posed by water accumulation: a/ At the job site, one employee used a hack saw to cut through a water pipe located deep inside of the trench. Water was pouring from the pipe onto the floor of the trench which was no longer visible. Adequate precautions such as a special support or shield system, continuous water removal through the use of a pump, or the use of a safety harness and a lifeline were not in use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $280
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.651 J02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $280.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(j)(2): Employees were not protected from excavated or other materials or equipment that could pose a hazard by falling or rolling into excavations. Protection was not provided by placing and keeping such materials or equipment at least two (2) feet (.61 m) from the edge of excavations, or by the use of retaining devices that are sufficient to prevent materials or equipment from falling or rolling into excavations, or by a combination of both, if necessary: a/ At the job site, the spoil pile was located adjacent to the east wall of the trench.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $280
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.651 K02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $200.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.651(k)(2): Where the competent person found evidence of a situation that could result in a possible cave-in, indications of failure of protective systems, hazardous atmospheres, or other hazardous conditions, exposed employees were not removed from the hazardous area until the necessary precautions were taken to ensure their safety: At the job site, the competent person failed to remove one employee from inside of the trench when the following hazards were noted: a/ Lack of protective head gear. b/ Lack of eye protection. c. Lack of a safe means of egress. d. The presence of standing water inside of the trench. e. The spoil pile located adjacent to the east wall of the trench.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $200
- — Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238220)
LOS ANGELES, CA—2026-07-10
PRIME SC MECHANICAL INC.
RICHARDSVILLE, KY—2026-07-10
69312 - SIEGRIST SERVICE COMPANY LLC
PONCE, PR—2026-07-10
WILLIAM ECHEVARR�A ANDINO
MODESTO, CA—2026-07-09
R.L. FULLER, INC.
SAN JOSE, CA—2026-07-09
ROOTER HERO
More inspections in MO
KANSAS CITY, MO—2026-07-09
NIAGARA BOTTLING
MONETT, MO—2026-07-09
MONETT METALS INC.
PARKVILLE, MO—2026-07-08
SKY-TECH ROOFING, LLC.
SPRINGFIELD, MO—2026-07-07
D & C CONSTRUCTION, LLC.
JOPLIN, MO—2026-07-07
SERVICE RECYCLING - NORTH PLANT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339802639.