Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: TMS ENTERPRISES, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of TMS ENTERPRISES, INC. in 1934 HIGHWAY 85, JONESBORO, GA 30238 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 339803157.

Watch TMS Enterprises, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for TMS Enterprises, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1934 HIGHWAY 85
City
JONESBORO
State
GA
ZIP
30238
Mailing
1934 HIGHWAY 85, JONESBORO, GA 30238
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $720.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 1377H130

29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:  a) Spray paint and mixing areas - An employee was exposed to eye irritation and an allergic skin reaction (rash) while mixing and spraying isocyanate containing paint components (hardeners) without wearing eye or hand protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $720
  • — Z (S) $1200

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 0440046113772590H130

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  (a) Spray painting and mixing areas- The employer did not verify that a personal protective equipment workplace hazard assessment had been performed for employees using hazardous substances, such as but not limited to, paints and hardeners, containing isocyanates, xylene, sec-butyl alcohol and n-butyl acetate. The employer could not produce the written certification that identified the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the dates of the hazard assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0440046113772590H130

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a) Spray painting areas- The employer had not established a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to hazardous substances such as, but not limited to, paints and hardeners containing isocyanates, xylene, sec-butyl alcohol and n-butyl acetate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 0440046113772590H130

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a) Spray painting areas- The employer had not provided hazard communication training to an employee exposed to hazardous substances such as, but not limited to, paints and hardeners containing isocyanates, xylene, sec-butyl alcohol and n-butyl acetate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 1377H130

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a) Spray painting areas- The employer had not established or implemented a respiratory protection program for an employee required to wear a half mask air purifying respirator while spray painting automobile parts. There was no written program, medical evaluations, fit-testing, or training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339803157.