VALLEY CITY, OH —
OSHA Inspection: HYPRODUCTION, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HYPRODUCTION, INC. in 6000 GRAFTON ROAD, VALLEY CITY, OH 44280 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 339867772.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HYPRODUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 6000 GRAFTON ROAD
- City
- VALLEY CITY
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44280
- Mailing
- 6000 GRAFTON ROAD, VALLEY CITY, OH 44280
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332710
- Employees
- 125
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4500.00 · Current $3150.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting: On or about July 22, 2014, the employer failed to train employees in the use of fire extinguishers or have a written emergency action plan in the alternative.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3150
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5400.00 · Current $3780.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: On or about July 22, 2014, the Central Machinery 8 inch drill press used to ream put parts did not have rotating chuck guarding.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3780
- — Z (S) $5400
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $5400.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2)(i): Safety guards on all operations where the work provides a suitable measure of protection to the operator, were not so constructed that the spindle end, nut, and outer flange were not exposed: On or about July 22, 2014, the employer failed to ensure employees operating bench grinders were protected against accidental contact with the spindle nut.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5400
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work: On or about July 22, 2014, the employer failed to ensure employees operating bench grinders were protected against accidental contact with the rotating parts. The employer did not have a work rest in place.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4500.00 · Current $3150.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i. On or about July 22, 2014, compressed air used to clean hand-held parts was not reduced to 30 psi or less.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3150
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: On or about July 22, 2014, the employer failed to re-train employees operating a Mitsubishi propane forklift, model FG30.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): On or about July 22, 2014, the employer failed to ensure employees operating a Mitsubishi propane forklift, model FG30 were certified prior to allowing them to operate it.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service: On or about July 22, 2014, the employer failed to ensure that a daily inspection of the Mitsubishi propane forklift, model number FG30 was being performed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332710)
CAMBRIDGE, MN—2026-07-09
111567 - VISION MACHINE INC
SAINT PAUL, MN—2026-07-09
111558 - ST PAUL MACHINE - DESIGN INC
EVERETT, WA—2026-07-07
WA317991968 - ONOMAC INDUSTRIES INC
SOUTH DEERFIELD, MA—2026-07-07
VISION MACHINING INC
LAKEVILLE, MN—2026-07-02
111518 - KD HOLDING COMPANY INC DBA MEDFAB MANUFACTURING CO
More inspections in OH
OXFORD, OH—2026-07-13
R&R SIDING LLC
CONNEAUT, OH—2026-07-13
CONTINENTAL STRUCTURAL PLASTICS
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
HARRISON, OH—2026-07-10
WEBER FAMILY FARMS LLC
JEFFERSON, OH—2026-07-10
LAKE CITY PLATING LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339867772.