Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: BASIC MARINE, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BASIC MARINE, INC. in 440 N. 10TH STREET, ESCANABA, MI 49829 (NAICS 336611). OSHA activity number 339907701.

Watch Basic Marine, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Basic Marine, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BASIC MARINE, INC.
Site address
440 N. 10TH STREET
City
ESCANABA
State
MI
ZIP
49829
Mailing
440 N. 10TH STREET, ESCANABA, MI 49829
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336611
Employees
19
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 B02

Serious Gravity 1 3 instances 19 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1320.00 · Current $660.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":    a. In building 1, the southeast exit leading out of the building was not marked by a sign reading "Exit".    b. In building 3, the southeast exit leading out of the building was not marked by a sign reading "Exit".    c. In building 3, the northwest exit leading out of the building was not marked by a sign reading "Exit".
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $660
  • — C (S) $1320
  • — Z (S) $1320

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1760.00 · Current $880.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    In building 1, the employer did not provide guarding around pulley(s) on the Buffalo Drill Press, Model No 22, S/N 66-4330.  Employees operated the drill press to drill metal pinkeepers for the Deck Barge Crane Ramp there by exposing employees to caught in hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $880
  • — C (S) $1760
  • — Z (S) $1760

1910.219 E01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs seven feet or less from the floor level were not guarded with a guard that extended to at least fifteen inches above the belt:     In building 1, employer did not provide guarding around horizontal belts on the Buffalo Drill Press, Model No 22, S/N 66-4330.  Employees operated the drill press to drill metal pinkeepers for the Deck Barge Crane Ramp there by exposing employees to caught in hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1915.89 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2200.00 · Current $1100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.89(d)(1)(i): A clear and specific outline of the scope and purpose of the lockout/tags-plus procedure;    The employers existing hazardous energy control procedures were inadequate in that the specific written procedures did not provide clear outline to prevent energization or start up, or release of hazardous energy, during servicing of machinery such as but not limited to, hydraulic brake press, mechanical brake press, burning table, welding machines and overhead cranes there by exposing employees to hazardous energy.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1100
  • — C (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $2200

1915.89 O01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2200.00 · Current $1100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.89(o)(1): The employer did not provide training to employees which incorporated the requirements of 1915.89(o)(2)(i) through (o)(2)(v):    The employer did not provide training to employees on the employers Lockout/tag-out program there by exposing employees to hazardous energy while performing maintenance, servicing and/or repair work on machines and equipment such as but not limited to, hydraulic brake press, mechanical brake press, burning table, welding machines and overhead cranes there by exposing employees to hazardous energy.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1100
  • — C (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $2200

1915.89 Q01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2200.00 · Current $1100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.89(q)(1): The employer shall conduct an audit of the lockout/tags-plus program and procedures currently in use at least annually to ensure that the procedures and the requirements of this section are being followed and to correct any deficiencies.    The employer did not inspect the energy control program and procedures as required under this standard.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1100
  • — C (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $2200

1915.112 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2200.00 · Current $1100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.112(b)(1)(i):  Employer did not ensure wire rope and wire-rope slings have permanently affixed and legible identification markings as prescribed by the manufacturer indicating the recommended safe working load for the type(s) of hitch(es) used.     Employees used P&H Crane Model 790 TC, 90 ton truck crane to move a barge crane ramp.  Four wire-rope slings used below the main hook did not have identification markings indicating the safe working load for the types of wire ropes used there by exposing employees struck by or crushing hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1100
  • — C (S) $2200
  • — Z (S) $2200

1915.504 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1760.00 · Current $880.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.504(b)(1): The employer did not post a fire watch during hot work operations when slag, weld splatter, or sparks might pass through an opening and caused a fire.     The employer did not post a fire watch while employees performed hot work operations inside the deck barge Omaha, when slag, weld splatter, or sparks past through an opening in the bottom of the barge landing on combustible material (wooden pallets) and could cause a fire.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $880
  • — C (S) $1760
  • — Z (S) $1760

1910.212 A03 II

Willful Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $60500.00 · Current $30250.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):     a. In building 1,  the employer did not provide machine guarding on Atlantic 450 ton press brake Model # 4d45012-10 at the point of operation. Employee was required to perform work within the danger zone to bend metal flanges there by exposing employee to an amputation hazard.    b. In building 3, the employer did not provide machine guarding on Cincinnati Hydraulic Press Brake at the point of operations there by exposing employee to an amputation hazard.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (W) $30250
  • — C (W) $60500
  • — Z (W) $60500

1915.73 B

Willful Gravity 10 13 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $70000.00 · Current $35000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.73(b): When employees were working in the vicinity of flush manholes and other small openings of comparable size in the deck and other working surfaces, such openings were not suitably covered or guarded to a height of not less than 30 inches.     a. In building 2, on barge SAM-1503, employees were working in the vicinity of a flush manhole (a) in the deck while installing safety stanchions and chains and such openings were not suitably covered or guarded there by exposing employees fall hazard.    b. In building 2, on barge SAM-1503, employees were working in the vicinity of a flush manhole (b) in the deck while installing safety stanchions and chains and such openings were not suitably covered or guarded there by exposing employees fall hazard.    c. In building 2, on barge SAM-1503, employees were working in the vicinity of a flush manhole (c) in the deck while installing safety stanchions and chains and such openings were not suitably covered or guarded there by exposing employees fall hazard.    d. In building 2, on barge SAM-1503, employees were working in the vicinity of a flush manhole (d) in the deck while installing safety stanchions and chains and such openings were not suitably covered or guarded there by exposing employees fall hazard.    e. In building 2, on barge SAM-1503, employees were working in the vicinity of a flush manhole (e) in the deck while installing safety stanchions and chains and such openings were not suitably covered or guarded there by exposing employees fall hazard.    f. In building 2, on barge SAM-1503, employees were working in the vicinity of a flush manhole (f) in the deck while installing safety stanchions and chains and such openings were not suitably covered or guarded there by exposing employees fall hazard.    g. In building 2, on barge SAM-1503, employees were working in the vicinity of a flush manhole (g) in the deck while installing safety stanchions and chains and such openings were not suitably covered or guarded there by exposing employees fall hazard.    h. In building 2, on barge SAM-1503, employees were working in the vicinity of a flush manhole (h) in the deck while installing safety stanchions and chains and such openings were not suitably covered or guarded there by exposing employees fall hazard.    i. In building 2, on barge SAM-1503, employees were working in the vicinity of a flush manhole (i) in the deck while installing safety stanchions and chains and such openings were not suitably covered or guarded there by exposing employees fall hazard.    j. In building 2, on barge SAM-1503, employees were working in the vicinity of a flush manhole (j) in the deck while installing safety stanchions and chains and such openings were not suitably covered or guarded there by exposing employees fall hazard.    k. In building 2, on barge SAM-1503, employees were working in the vicinity of a flush manhole (k) in the deck while installing safety stanchions and chains and such openings were not suitably covered or guarded there by exposing employees fall hazard.    l. In building 2, on barge SAM-1503, employees were working in the vicinity of a flush manhole (l) in the deck while installing safety stanchions and chains and such openings were not suitably covered or guarded there by exposing employees fall hazard.    m. In building 2, on barge SAM-1503, employees were working in the vicinity of a flush manhole (m) in the deck while installing safety stanchions and chains and such openings were not suitably covered or guarded there by exposing employees fall hazard.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (W) $35000
  • — C (W) $70000
  • — Z (W) $70000

1915.73 D

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1915.73(d): When employees were exposed to unguarded edges of decks, platforms, flats, or similar flat surfaces, more than 5 feet above a solid surface, the edges were not guarded by adequate guardrails meeting the requirements of 29 CFR 1915.71(j)(1) and (2).    In building 2, USACE Deck Barge SAM-1503, on the main deck, employees were working within six inches of unguarded edge while installing safety stanchions and chains. Employees were not provided or required to wear fall protection there by exposing employees to a fall of 10 ½ feet to the ground.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (W) $0
  • — C (W) $0
  • — Z (W) $0

1915.155 A01

Willful Gravity 10 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $70000.00 · Current $35000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.155(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that affected employees wore protective helmets when at risk from being injured by falling objects.    a. In building 2, employees were not required to wear protective helmets at anytime while working in or around Deck Barge SAM-1503 while employees were installing metal stanchions for safety railing six inches from the edge of the barge there by exposing employees to struck by hazard from falling objects.     b. On the north side of building 2, employees used P&H Crane Model 790 TC, 90 ton truck crane to lift a deck barge crane ramp from inside building 2 to the outside of building 2 and were not required to wear protective helmets during the crane move there by exposing employees to struck by hazard from falling objects.     c. In building 2, employees were not required to wear protective helmets while working inside the hull of Deck Barge SAM-1503 there by exposing employees to struck by hazard from falling objects through unguarded flush manholes.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (W) $35000
  • — C (W) $70000
  • — Z (W) $70000

1915.112 C02

Repeat Gravity 1 1 instance 19 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2640.00 · Current $1320.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1915.112(c)(2): Each chain did not bear an indication of the month in which it was thoroughly inspected.    On the pier area located adjacent to building 3, employee was operating a Harnischfeger P&H Crane, Model Number #670 WLC-70 ton crawler to load a zodiac boat onto the tugboat Erika Kobasic. Chain slings were used to lift the zodiac onto the tugboat, there had been no inspection of the chain slings and no identification markings on the chain slings which indicated the month of inspection. Employees were exposed to struck by hazards.    The Basic Marine Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1915.112(c)(2) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 301604252, citation number 1, item number 14 and was affirmed as a final order on August 12, 2013, with respect to a workplace located at Basic Marine, 440 N. 10th Street in Escanaba, Michigan.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $1320
  • — C (R) $2640
  • — Z (R) $2640

1910.180 D06

Repeat 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $200.00 · Current $100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.180(d)(6): Monthly, dated and signed inspection records and reports for truck crane(s) were not provided for critical items such as (but not limited to) brakes, crane hooks and ropes:    a. The employer did not maintain signed monthly inspection records for Harnischfeger P&H Crane, Model Number #670 WLC-70 ton crawler.    b. The employer did not maintain signed monthly inspection records for Harnischfeger P&H Crane Model 790 TC, 90 ton truck crane.    The Basic Marine Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 1910.180(d)(6) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 301604252, citation number 3, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on August 12, 2013, with respect to a workplace located at Basic Marine, 440 N. 10th Street in Escanaba, Michigan.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (R) $100
  • — C (R) $200
  • — Z (R) $200

View BASIC MARINE, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339907701.