Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: HUGO SANCHEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of HUGO SANCHEZ in 4270 HAMMOND BRIDGE DR., SUWANEE, GA 30024 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 339933772.

Watch Hugo Sanchez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hugo Sanchez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
HUGO SANCHEZ
Site address
4270 HAMMOND BRIDGE DR.
City
SUWANEE
State
GA
ZIP
30024
Mailing
225 JOHNSON RD., FOREST PARK, GA 30297
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.  On or about 09/03/14 located at Lot 108, 4270 Hammond Bridge Dr., Suwanee, GA:  Employees were exposed to falls and struck- by hazard, while preforming framing work from the make shift scaffolds. The employer failed to install guard rails and it was not fully decked.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: (a)  NOTE TO CSHO: USE THIS OPTION WHEN THE EMPLOYER (1) FAILED TO SATISFY THE SECTION 501(B)(13) REQUIREMENTS, AND (2) FAILED TO PROVE INFEASIBILITY/GREATER HAZARD AND/OR FAILED  TO DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT A SATISFACTORY FALL PROTECTION PLAN UNDER 1926.502(K). PLEASE DESCRIBE THE FALL PROTECTION PLAN DEFICIENCIES IN YOUR AVD.  On or about 09/03/14 located at Lot 108, 4270 Hammond Bridge Dr., Suwanee, GA:  The employer failed to provide personal fall protection for employees that were exposed to fall hazards of up to 35 feet and with a 8/12 pitch while framing an apartment complex.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

View HUGO SANCHEZ's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339933772.