Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: JMD ROOFING & SIDING, LLC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JMD ROOFING & SIDING, LLC. in 9 DELTA PLACE, KINGSTON, NY 12401 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 339966632.

Watch JMD Roofing & Siding, LLC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JMD Roofing & Siding, LLC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9 DELTA PLACE
City
KINGSTON
State
NY
ZIP
12401
Mailing
36 OAKLAND AVENUE, DANBURY, CT 06810
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2):  The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  (a) Jobsite - on or about September 24, 2014 - the employer did not provide regular inspections of the jobsite by a competent person.  Observed hazards include the lack of Personal Protective Equipment being used by employees, ladder set-up and use, fall protection on the steep pitched roof deck and the lack of first aid supplies on the site.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1926.95(a):  Personal protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided, used, or maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition it was necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation, or physical contact.  (a) Building Roof - on or about September 24, 2014 - an eye injury hazard existed on site.  Employees that were using pneumatic nail guns to install roof shingles were not wearing any eye protection, such as safety glasses with side shields or goggles.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $1200.00 · Current $1200.00
29 CFR 1926.100(a):  Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  (a) Jobsite - on or about September 24, 2014 - a struck by hazard existed on site.  The ground laborer was not wearing a hard hat.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):   (a) Building Roof - on or about September 24, 2014 - a fall hazard ranging between 10 feet, 8 inches to 19 feet existed on site.  Employees were installing new roof shingles on a 7 on 12 pitched residential roof deck without any conventional fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):  The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  (a) Building Roof - on or about September 24, 2014 - the employer did not provide a comprehensive training program to the employees that were performing roofing work on a steep-pitched residential roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):  Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  (a) Building Roof - on or about September 24, 2014 - a fall hazard of approximately 19 feet existed on site.  The access ladder to the work area on the roof deck did not extend the requisite three feet above the upper surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.1060 A01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1)(i):  The employer did not ensure that each employee using ladders and/or stairways had been trained by a competent person in the nature of fall hazards in the work area:  (a) Building Roof - on or about September 24, 2014 - the employer did not provide ladder training to the employees that were using extension ladders to perform roofing work.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.50 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.50(d)(1):  First-aid supplies were not easily accessible when required:  (a) Jobsite - on or about September 24, 2014 - no first aid supplies were available on site.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339966632.