KAUKAUNA, WI —
OSHA Inspection: PRECISION CABINETS AND TRIM LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PRECISION CABINETS AND TRIM LLC in N177 SPEEDWAY LANE, KAUKAUNA, WI 54130 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 339972333.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PRECISION CABINETS AND TRIM LLC
- Site address
- N177 SPEEDWAY LANE
- City
- KAUKAUNA
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54130
- Mailing
- N177 SPEEDWAY LN., KAUKAUNA, WI 54130
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 337110
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
15 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.107 B02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1700.00 · Current $850.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(2): The interior surfaces of spray booths were not smooth and continuous without edges and otherwise designed to prevent pocketing of residues and facilitate cleaning and washing without injury: a) The spray booth had plastic hanging on the walls and overspray buildup in the corner of the booth on the date of the inspection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $850
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.107 B03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(3): Floors. The floor surface of a spray booth and operator's working area, if combustible, shall be covered with noncombustible material of such character as to facilitate the safe cleaning and removal of residues: a) The spray booth had plywood on the floor on the date of the inspection which was not covered with a noncombustible material.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.107 B05 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): The employer did not have visible gauges, audible alarms, or pressure activated devices installed to indicate or ensure that the required air velocity was maintained on a spray booth: a) The spray booth was not equipped with gauges, audible alarms or pressure activated devices to indicate or ensure required air velocity on the date of the inspection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.107 E02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.107(e)(2): The quantity of flammable liquids or liquids with a flashpoint greater than 199.4 degrees F (93 degrees C) kept in the vicinity of spraying operations were not a minimum required for operations or they exceeded a supply for one day or one shift: a) The spray booth was being used to store cans of finishing materials along with cans of waste materials on the date of the inspection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1360.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: a) On the date of the inspection an employee was spraying lacquer on doors in the spray booth without eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1360
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1700.00 · Current $850.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: a) The company did not have a written respiratory program on the date of the inspection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $850
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.134 D01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(i): Selection of appropriate respirators was not based on the respiratory hazard(s) to which the worker was exposed and user factors that affect respirator performance and reliability: a) The company did not select the proper respirator for the employee spraying lacquer on doors on the date of the inspection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) The company was not providing medical evaluations for the employees wearing respirators on the date of the inspection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) The company was not doing fit testing prior to initial use or annually for the employees wearing respirators on the date of the inspection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: a) The company did not provide respirator training prior to assignment for employees required to wear respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1700.00 · Current $850.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace: a) No powered industrial truck training was being provided for the employees driving lift trucks at the site.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $850
- — Z (S) $1700
1910.213 C03
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2040.00 · Current $1020.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(3): Hand-fed ripsaw(s) did not have non kickback fingers or dogs so located as to oppose the thrust or tendency of the saw to pick up the material or to throw it back toward the operator: a) On or about 10/1/2014 the JET 10" Tilting Arbor saw was not equipped with non kickback fingers or dogs during the inspection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1020
- — Z (S) $2040
1910.305 G01 IV A
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1360.00 · Current $680.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure: a) On or about 10/1/2014 flexible cords were run overhead and were being used in place of permanent wiring in the shop.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $680
- — Z (S) $1360
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $1360.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: a) The company did not have a written hazard communication program on the date of the inspection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $1360
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not maintain copies of the required material safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical in the workplace: a) The company did not have a copy of the material safety data sheet available for each of the chemicals on site on the date of the inspection. SHER-WOOD Hi-Bild PreCat Lacquer was being used on site without an MSDS for T77F57.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 337110)
VESTAL, NY—2026-07-08
BARNWOOD KITCHEN CABINETS
DEERWOOD, MN—2026-07-02
111522 - DUFFNEY CUSTOM CABINETS LLC
EVERETT, WA—2026-06-29
WA317991850 - JMC CABINETS & INTERIORS INC
PUEBLO, CO—2026-06-26
WESTWIND WOOD SPECIALTIES INC.
BRAINERD, MN—2026-06-25
111484 - TRADITIONAL CABINETRY LLC
More inspections in WI
MUSCODA, WI—2026-07-10
SCOT INDUSTRIES, INC
FRANKLIN, WI—2026-07-10
EDGE BROADBAND SOLUTIONS LLC
APPLETON, WI—2026-07-10
LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
KIMBERLY, WI—2026-07-10
ENRIQUE RESENDIC
SLINGER, WI—2026-07-10
DYLAN MATTHEW SHELLEY LLC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 339972333.