Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: EBM MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EBM MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS in 4738 LOMA ESTER DR., EL PASO, TX 79938 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 340004514.

Watch EBM Mechanical Contractors — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for EBM Mechanical Contractors is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4738 LOMA ESTER DR.
City
EL PASO
State
TX
ZIP
79938
Mailing
11501 JERRY LEWIS WAY, EL PASO, TX 79936
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238220
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2400.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employees engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8m) or more above the lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    On or about October 14, 2014, and at times prior thereto, two employees were observed working on the roof of a house installing a new air conditioning unit without any form of fall protection and were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6-feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2400.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who was exposed to fall hazards that enabled each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:     On or about October 14, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide a training program for two employees who were observed working on the roof of a house installing a new air conditioning unit without any form of fall protection and were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6-feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2400.00 · Current $1200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:     On or about October 14, 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees used a 20-foot extension ladder positioned on the backside of the house to access the roof, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the roof surface. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of greater than six feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1200
  • — Z (S) $2400

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): The non-self-supporting ladder was not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support):    On or about October 14, 2014, and at times prior thereto, employees used a 20-foot extension ladder positioned on the backside of the house to access the roof, the ladder was not set correctly nor was it positioned vertically at a 4:1 angle. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of greater than six feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.21 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $400.00 · Current $200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:     On or about October 14, 2014, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not provide hazard recognition training for employees performing activities including, but not limited to, working on the roof without any form of fall protection and were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6-feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $200
  • — Z (O) $400

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340004514.