Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: HUB CITY METAL RECYCLERS

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HUB CITY METAL RECYCLERS in 2211 COUNTY RD O, JUNCTION CITY, WI 54443 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 340029230.

Watch HUB City Metal Recyclers — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for HUB City Metal Recyclers is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2211 COUNTY RD O
City
JUNCTION CITY
State
WI
ZIP
54443
Mailing
2211 COUNTY RD O, JUNCTION CITY, WI 54443
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423930
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1120.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  a) On and at times prior to October 23, 2014 the employer had not established an energy control program and procedures to ensure employee(s) performing servicing and maintenance tasks on the Excel 60 horizontal baler were protected from hazardous energy and/or unintentional start-up.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.147 D06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(6): Prior to starting work on machines or equipment that had been locked out or tagged out, the authorized employee did not verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment had been accomplished:  a) The authorized person did not verify that the Excel 60 horizontal baler was de-energized prior to performing maintenance and cleaning tasks inside the baler.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C05 II C 1

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1120.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(C)(1): Lockout devices were not substantial enough to prevent removal without the use of excessive force or unusual techniques, such as with the use of bolt cutters or other metal cutting tools:  a) On and at times prior to October 23, 2014 the lockout devices utilized for energy control were not substantial to prevent device tampering.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1120
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.147 C05 II D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(D): Lockout devices and tagout devices did not indicate the identity of the employee applying the device(s):   a) At times prior to October 23, 2014 the lockout device used to disconnect the Excel 60 baler did not indicate the identity of the employee that applied it.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 A06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates or markings were maintained in a legible condition:  a) On and at times prior to October 23, 2014 the nameplate on the Komatsu LP forklift was not in a legible condition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  a) On and at times prior to October 23, 2014 the employer did not ensure that each forklift operated was competent on safe vehicle operation by completion of a practical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340029230.