OSHA Inspection: JOSE MUNIZ

Issued

2015-01-22 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-02-26 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $400.00 · Current $400.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  On November 25, 2014, Jose Nunez, was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through written certification that each citation was abated.  Abatement certification was not received for the following violations:        a.    Citation 1 Item 1, and      b.    Citation 1 Item 2, and     c.    Citation 1 Item 3.

Issued

2014-11-25 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-12-02 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:      Jose Muniz dba Jose Nuniz Roofing had employees exposed to struck-by hazards in the eyes, while using pneumatic guns without safety glasses, on a residential construction site in Tuscola, Illinois.

Issued

2014-11-25 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-12-02 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2400.00 · Current $2400.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     Jose Muniz dba Jose Nuniz Roofing had employees exposed to 9 ft., 5 in. fall hazards without fall protection, while performing roofing work on a residential construction site in Tuscola, Illinois.

Issued

2014-11-25 00:00:00

Abate by

2014-12-02 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:       Jose Muniz dba Jose Nuniz Roofing had employees exposed to 9 ft., 5 in. fall hazards, while accessing and exiting the roof via an extension ladder that extended 2.5 ft. above the upper landing surface of the roof, without fall protection, on a residential construction site in Tuscola, Illinois.