Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: POWDER COATINGS PLUS

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of POWDER COATINGS PLUS in 1158 STATE HIGHWAY H, SIKESTON, MO 63801 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 340102276.

Watch Powder Coatings Plus — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Powder Coatings Plus is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1158 STATE HIGHWAY H
City
SIKESTON
State
MO
ZIP
63801
Mailing
1158 STATE HIGHWAY H, SIKESTON, MO 63801
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    At the time of the inspection, the employer had not trained and certified employees who were designated to operate forklifts.   Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation.  The documentation should include written verification of abatement, applicable measurements or monitoring results, and photographs or videos which you believe will be helpful.  The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $400
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

Hazardous substances 90109965

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures in any workplace where respirators were necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators were required by the employer:  (a)  A written respiratory protection program was not provided where respiratory protection was required to protect the health of an employee. Employees were required to wear 1/2 mask organic vapor respirators while spraying powder coatings. Employees were required to wear an air supplied respirator while sand blasting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

CENTRIA

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340102276.