GREENWICH, CT —
OSHA Inspection: PIEKOS-GAWIN, INC.
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of PIEKOS-GAWIN, INC. in 33 MAPLE AVE., GREENWICH, CT 06830 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 340121409.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PIEKOS-GAWIN, INC.
- Site address
- 33 MAPLE AVE.
- City
- GREENWICH
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06830
- Mailing
- 17 DIXON LAKE DR., MAHOPAC, NY 10541
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2400.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Platform(s) on all working levels of scaffolds, were not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and guardrail supports such that the space between adjacent units, and the space between the platform and the uprights. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the metal frame scaffold platform from that the employee was working at a height above 10 feet was fully planked.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2400
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1960.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the metal frame scaffold from that the employee was working at a height above 10 feet was erected under the supervision of a person competent in scaffold erection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $1960.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was working from the metal frame scaffold platform at a height above 10 feet was protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was working from the residential roofs edge at a height above six feet was protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails, safety nets or a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2000.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was working from the metal frame scaffold was trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400
- — Z (S) $2000
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was exposed to fall hazards while working from the roofs edge at a height above six feet was trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
SIOUX FALLS, SD—2026-07-13
H & R ROOFING OF SOUTH DAKOTA, INC.
HENDERSON, NV—2026-07-13
INTEGRITY ROOFING LLC
CORTLANDT MANOR, NY—2026-07-13
LG BUILDERS INC.
CAMDEN, OH—2026-07-13
ALBERTO MORALES
BLOOMINGTON, IL—2026-07-13
UNKNOWN CONTRACTOR
More inspections in CT
BRIDGEPORT, CT—2026-07-10
WRR, INC.
BERLIN, CT—2026-07-10
MMF CONSTRUCTION LLC
NAUGATUCK, CT—2026-07-08
WHITING-TURNER LCT2 JOINT VENTURE
SOMERS, CT—2026-07-08
F&G RECYCLING LLC
STAMFORD, CT—2026-07-07
FAIRFIELD AVENUE MAINTENANCE COMPANY, INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340121409.