OSHA Inspection: HUNTING SPECIALTY SUPPLY LP

Issued

2015-01-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-02-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $3500.00 · Current $1750.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:     The employer does not develop, document and utilize procedures for the control of potentially hazardous energy.       a. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Leadwell CNC lathe, Model LT-20, ID #1, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.     b. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by  hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on an Okuma Cadet CNC lathe,  ID #2, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.      c. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on an Okuma CNC lathe, Model LB25, ID #3, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.     d. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Doosan CNC lathe, Puma 240, ID #4, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.     e. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Doosan CNC lathe, Model Puma 300L, ID #5, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.        f. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by  hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Leadwell CNC lathe, Model LTC-30CPL, ID #6, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.         g. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by  hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Fadal CNC mill, Model VMC4020, ID #7, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.     h. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Okuma CNC mill, Model Genos M560-V, ID #8, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.     i. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Fadal CNC mill, ID #9, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.      j. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Fadal CNC mill, ID #10, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.     k. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Fadal CNC mill, ID #11, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.      l. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when servicing a Mori Seiki CNC lathe, Model SL-25, ID #12, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.      m. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Mori Seiki CNC lathe, Model SL-25M, ID #13, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.      n. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Doosan CNC lathe, Model Lynx 220L, ID #14, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.      o. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Doosan CNC lathe, Model Lynx 220L, ID #15, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.     p. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Doosan CNC mill, Model VC 500, ID #16, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.     q. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Doosan CNC lathe, Model Puma 240, ID #17, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.     r. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on an Okuma CNC mill, Model MA-550VB, ID #18, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.      s. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Doosan CNC mill, Model puma 2600, ID #19, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.      t. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Doosan CNC mill, Model Puma 2600, ID #20, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.      u. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Doosan CNC mill, Model Puma 2600, ID #21, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.      v. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Doosan CNC mill, Model DNM 500 II, ID #22, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.     w. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014 and times prior thereto, where employees in the production area were exposed to electrical and struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on a Doosan CNC mill, Model DNM 500 II ID #23, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.     x. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, and times prior thereto where employees in the Saw area were exposed to struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on an Amada automatic band saw, Model HA250W, ID #9, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.     y. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, and times prior thereto where employees in the Saw area were exposed to struck-by hazards when performing service and/or maintenance on an Amada automatic band saw, Model HA250W, ID #2, without procedures being developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that procedures are developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in activities covered by this section.

Issued

2015-01-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-02-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2100.00 · Current $1050.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:     The employer does not protect the employees with one or more methods of machine guarding.      a. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees in the Saw area were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating an Amada automatic band saw, Model HA250W, ID #9, without guarding over the unused section of the saw blade.     b. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where employees in the Saw area were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating an Amada automatic band saw, Model HA250W, ID #2, without guarding over the unused section of the saw blade.    Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that one or more methods of machine guarding are provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.

Issued

2015-01-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-02-03 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $4900.00 · Current $2000.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    The employer does not guard the point of operation of machines whose operation exposes employees to injuries.     a. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, and times prior thereto where employees in the Production area were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Leadwell CNC lathe, Model Lt-20, ID #1, without a point of operation guard.     b. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, and times prior thereto where employees in the Production area were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating an Okuma Cadet CNC lathe, ID #2, without a point of operation guard.     c. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, and times prior thereto where employees in the Production area were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating an Okuma CNC lathe, Model LB25, ID #3, without a point of operation guard.     d. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, and times prior thereto where employees in the Production area were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Doosan CNC lathe, Puma 240, ID #4, without a point of operation guard.     e. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, and times prior thereto where employees in the Production area were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Doosan CNC lathe, Model Puma 300L, ID #5, without a point of operation guard.     f. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, and times prior thereto where employees in the Production area were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Leadwell CNC lathe, Model LTC-30CPL, ID #6, without a point of operation guard.     g. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, and times prior thereto where employees in the Production area were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Mori Seiki CNC lathe, Model SL-25, ID #12, without a point of operation guard.     h. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, and times prior thereto where employees in the Production area were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Doosan CNC lathe, Model Lynx 220L, ID #14, without a point of operation guard.     i. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, and times prior thereto where employees in the Production area were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Doosan CNC lathe, Model Lynx 220L, ID #15, without a point of operation guard.     j. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, and times prior thereto where employees in the Production area were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Doosan CNC lathe, Model Puma 240, ID #17, without a point of operation guard.     k. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, and times prior thereto where employees in the Manual Machine area were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating an Acra manual lathe, Model 1660TVS, without a point of operation guard.     l. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, and times prior thereto where employees in the Manual Machine area were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Bridgeport mill, Series I, SN J-253966, without a point of operation guard.     m. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, and times prior thereto where employees in the Manual Machine area were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Bridgeport mill, SN J-93183, without a point of operation guard.     n. This violation was observed on or about December 8, 2014, where an employee in the Production area was exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a Lagun milling machine, Model FTV-2, without a point of operation guard.     o. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, and times prior thereto where employees in the Production area were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating a small manual lathe, ID #12, without a point of operation guard.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that guards are installed on all machines to protect employees from the point of operation.

Issued

2015-01-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-02-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    The employer does not guard pulley(s) seven feet or less from the floor. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, on the west wall in the Production area where employees were exposed to a caught-in hazard when operating a Central Machine sander without a pulley being guarded.     Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that pulleys seven feet or less from the floor are guarded.

Issued

2015-01-14 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-02-20 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    The employer does not guard belt(s) seven feet or less from the floor. This violation occurred on or about December 8, 2014, on the west wall in the Production area where employees were exposed to a caught-in hazard when operating a Central Machine sander without a belt being guarded.      Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation showing that it is in compliance with the standard, including describing the steps that it is taking to ensure that belt(s) seven feet or less from the floor are guarded.