Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,214Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: WALTRICH PLASTIC CORPORATION OF GEORGIA, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WALTRICH PLASTIC CORPORATION OF GEORGIA, INC. in 3005 AIRPORT ROAD, WALTHOURVILLE, GA 31333 (NAICS 313230). OSHA activity number 340181999.

Watch Waltrich Plastic Corporation OF Georgia, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Waltrich Plastic Corporation OF Georgia, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3005 AIRPORT ROAD
City
WALTHOURVILLE
State
GA
ZIP
31333
Mailing
P.O. BOX D, WALTHOURVILLE, GA 31333
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
313230
Employees
22
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1360.00 · Current $680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toe boards:    A) Extruder area, on or about January 16, 2015, the top rail for the guardrail system was only 36 inches high for platform on extruder number 2 and there was no chain or a gate across ladder access opening, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 4 feet 4 inches.      B) Extruder area, on or about January 16, 2015, the work platform on extruder number 4, did not have a mid-rail and there was no chain or gate across ladder access opening, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 4 feet 6 inches.      C) Extruder area, on or about January 16, 2015, the work platform on extruder number 5 did not have a mid-rail and there was no chain or gate across ladder access opening, exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 4 feet 5 inches.      D) Extruder area, on or about January 16, 2015, the work platform on extruder number 7 did not have a mid-rail and there was no chain or gate across ladder access opening, exposing employees to a fall hazard of over 4 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $680
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1400.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:     A) Maintenance shop, on or about, January 14, 2015, the rotating bit on a Bridgeport milling machine was not guarded, exposing employees to flying materials and possible lacerations from touching the cutting bit.     B) Maintenance shop, on or about, January 14, 2015, the chuck on the Hendey lathe was not guarded exposing employees to the hazard of flying materials and lacerations from the rotating chuck.     C) Maintenance shop, on or about, January 14, 2015, the self-adjusting gravity guard on the Everett Chop saw would not automatically return to and adequately cover the cut off wheel, exposing employee to the hazard of lacerations.       D) Weaving Department, on or about January 14, 2015, weaving machines such as, but not limited to, weaving machine numbers 3, 4, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27, 29, 30, 32, 44, 45, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, and 52 has a spinning metal bar in the fill carrier that was not guarded, exposing employees to a hazard of lacerations from being struck by the spinning metal bar.      E) Weaving Department, on or about, January 14, 2015, weaving machines such as, but not limited to weaving machine numbers 3, 4, 20, 21, 22, 26, 27, 29, 30, 32, 44, 45, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, and 52, have rollers that the tape has to run through. These rollers create an in-running nip point that was not guarded, exposing employees to a hazard of fractures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1360.00 · Current $680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:     A) Maintenance shop, on or about January 14, 2015, a Dayton bench grinder did not have a tongue guard for one of the grinding wheels and the tongue guard for the other grinding wheel was approximately 1 inch above the grinding wheel, exposing employees to a hazard of being struck by an exploding grinding wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $680
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.219 E03 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1360.00 · Current $680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):     A) Packing Dept. on or about January 14, 2015, the belt drive beneath the table for the blocking machine was not properly guarded, exposing employees to an in-running nip point hazard.     B) Machine shop, on or about January 14, 2015, the belt drive on a bench grinder was not properly guarded, exposing employees to an in-running nip point hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $680
  • — Z (S) $1360

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:     A) Facility, on or about January 23, 2015, the company did not perform an annual periodic inspection of the company's Lock Out / Tag Out program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    A) Facility, on or about January 23, 2015, not all employees who operated a powered industrial truck received training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340181999.