STOUGHTON, MA —
OSHA Inspection: CHESTNUT HEALTH CARE ALLIANCE, INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of CHESTNUT HEALTH CARE ALLIANCE, INC. in 1044 PARK STREET, STOUGHTON, MA 02072 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 340196526.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CHESTNUT HEALTH CARE ALLIANCE, INC.
- Site address
- 1044 PARK STREET
- City
- STOUGHTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 02072
- Mailing
- 1044 PARK STREET, STOUGHTON, MA 02072
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 623110
- Employees
- 95
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2800.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition: Kitchen: The Dishwashing Station was not maintained free of tripping hazards. On or about January 17, 2015, an employee tripped and fell on dishware trays that were stacked on the floor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $2800
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2100.00 · Current $1575.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment (PPE): Establishment: Employer's PPE assessment did not include all elements required by this section such as a) selecting, and having each affected employee using, the types of PPE that will protect the affected employee from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment, b) communicating selection decisions to each affected employee, and c) selecting PPE that properly fits each affected employee for operations including, but not limited to: (a) Kitchen - adequate hand protection for employees who handle hazardous detergents such as Ultra Klene, Ultra Dry, Ultra San, Ultra Lime and Quaternary 146 Sanitizer. (b) Kitchen - adequate footwear for employees who work in the Kitchen where the floors are frequently wet and/or greasy.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1575
- — Z (S) $2100
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: Establishment: Employer did not include in the written certification of the workplace hazard assessment, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment and identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment for operations such as handling hazardous dishwashing detergents and walking and working on wet and/or greasy floors.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.138 B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $2100.00 · Current $1050.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(b): The employer did not base selection of appropriate hand protection on an evaluation of the performance characteristics of the hand protection relative to the tasks to be performed, conditions present, duration of use, and the hazards and potential hazards identified: Establishment: Employer did not select and ensure the use of gloves that provided adequate protection for employees engaged in operations such as : a) Replacing the 5-gallon buckets of hazardous cleaning detergents such as Ultra Klene, Ultra Dry and Ultra San used for dishwashing. b) Descaling the dish washer machine with Ultra Lime, a corrosive detergent.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050
- — Z (S) $2100
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $3500.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report the in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours: Establishment: Employer did not report an in-hospitalization injury within 24 hours of the time of injury. On the morning of January 17, 2015, an employee suffered a serious injury that required hospitalization. The injury was reported by the employer on January 19, 2015 at approximately 3:24 pm ET via toll free 800 telephone number.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000
- — Z (O) $3500
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 623110)
GRANTS PASS, OR—2026-07-07
317744714 - CASCADE LIVING GROUP - GRANTS PASS LLC
TIFFIN, OH—2026-06-30
670 OH OPCO, LLC
EDMONDS, WA—2026-06-25
WA317991719 - KALESTA HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC
LINCOLNTON, NC—2026-06-24
161444 - LINCOLNTON REHABILITATION CENTER, LLC
CENTRALIA, WA—2026-06-23
WA317991797 - PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES WASHINGTON
More inspections in MA
WORCESTER, MA—2026-07-10
QUINSIGAMOND COMMUNITY COLLEGE
FITCHBURG, MA—2026-07-10
KELLEY WOOD PRODUCTS, INC.
EVERETT, MA—2026-07-10
HORIZON RETAIL CONSTRUCTION INC
NORTON, MA—2026-07-09
DYNAMIC RESIDENTIAL ROOF MARKETING, LLC
NORTON, MA—2026-07-09
LM GENERAL CONSTRUCTION INC.
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340196526.