Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
3,913,242Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: CHESTNUT HEALTH CARE ALLIANCE, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of CHESTNUT HEALTH CARE ALLIANCE, INC. in 1044 PARK STREET, STOUGHTON, MA 02072 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 340196526.

Watch Chestnut Health Care Alliance, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Chestnut Health Care Alliance, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1044 PARK STREET
City
STOUGHTON
State
MA
ZIP
02072
Mailing
1044 PARK STREET, STOUGHTON, MA 02072
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
623110
Employees
95
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition:    Kitchen:    The Dishwashing Station was not maintained free of tripping hazards. On or about January 17, 2015, an employee tripped and fell on dishware trays that were stacked on the floor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2100.00 · Current $1575.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):    Establishment:    Employer's PPE assessment did not include all elements required by this section such as a) selecting, and having each affected employee using, the types of PPE that will protect the affected employee from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment, b) communicating selection decisions to each affected employee, and c) selecting PPE that properly fits each affected employee for operations including, but not limited to:  (a) Kitchen - adequate hand protection for employees who handle hazardous detergents such as Ultra Klene, Ultra Dry, Ultra San, Ultra Lime and Quaternary 146 Sanitizer.  (b) Kitchen - adequate footwear for employees who work in the Kitchen where the floors are frequently wet and/or greasy.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1575
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  Establishment:  Employer did not include in the written certification of  the workplace hazard assessment, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment and identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment for operations such as handling hazardous dishwashing detergents and walking and working on wet and/or greasy floors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.138 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2100.00 · Current $1050.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.138(b): The employer did not base selection of appropriate hand protection on an evaluation of the performance characteristics of the hand protection relative to the tasks to be performed, conditions present, duration of use, and the hazards and potential hazards identified:    Establishment:    Employer did not select and ensure the use of gloves that provided adequate protection for employees engaged in operations such as :  a) Replacing the 5-gallon buckets of hazardous cleaning detergents such as Ultra Klene, Ultra Dry and Ultra San used for dishwashing.  b) Descaling the dish washer machine with Ultra Lime, a corrosive detergent.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1050
  • — Z (S) $2100

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $1000.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report the in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours:    Establishment:    Employer did not report an in-hospitalization injury within 24 hours of the time of injury. On the morning of January 17, 2015, an employee suffered a serious injury that required hospitalization.  The injury was reported by the employer on January 19, 2015 at approximately 3:24 pm ET via toll free 800 telephone number.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1000
  • — Z (O) $3500

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340196526.