OSHA Inspection: JOSE ABIMAEL CRUZ CARMONA

Issued

2015-09-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-10-15 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $400.00 · Current $400.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  On June 2, 2015, Jose Abimael Cruz Carmona was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through written certification that each citation was abated.  Abatement certification was not received for the following violations:      a.    Citation 1 Item 1a & b, and b.    Citation 1 Item 2a & b.

Issued

2015-09-10 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-10-15 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $400.00 · Current $400.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  On June 2, 2015, , Jose Abimael Cruz Carmona was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through documents that each citation was abated.  Abatement documentation was not received for the following violations:          Citation 1 Item 3a - c

Issued

2015-06-02 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-06-12 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:     Employees were exposed to a fall hazard and struck by hazards in the eyes, on a residential construction site in Mahomet, Illinois.  The employer did not have an effective safety and health program with specific work rules, competent person oversight, and employee training to govern employee activities.

Issued

2015-06-02 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-06-12 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)     Employees were exposed to a fall hazard and struck by hazards in the eyes, on a residential construction site in Mahomet, Illinois.  The employer did not have a competent person at the construction site, who was competent in safety rules and requirements, in order to conduct frequent and periodic safety inspections at the construction site.

Issued

2015-06-02 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-06-12 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury:     Employees were exposed to struck by hazards in the eyes from the use of a pneumatic gun without eye protection, on a residential construction site in Mahomet, Illinois.  The employer did not provide the employees with the knowledge to recognize construction safety hazards, as well as the procedures to follow in order to minimize or eliminate those safety hazards.

Issued

2015-06-02 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-06-12 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    Employees were exposed to struck by hazards in the eyes from the use of a pneumatic gun without eye protection, on a residential construction site in Mahomet, Illinois.

Issued

2015-06-02 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-06-12 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $2800.00 · Current $2800.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system.     Employees engaged in residential activities were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 20ft and appropriate fall protection was not being used.

Issued

2015-06-02 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-06-12 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:     Employees engaged in residential activities were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 20ft and appropriate fall protection was not being used. The employer did not provided construction safety training to employees, in order to provided them with the knowledge necessary to recognized the hazards of falling and the safety requirements associated with fall protection, as well as the proper work procedures to follow, in order to minimize and eliminate the fall hazards.

Issued

2015-06-02 00:00:00

Abate by

2015-06-12 00:00:00

Penalty

Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.     Employees were exposed to a fall hazard and the employer did not maintain evidence of the required training. There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.