Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: STERLING ENGINEERING CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STERLING ENGINEERING CORPORATION in 236 NEW HARTFORD ROAD, BARKHAMSTED, CT 06063 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 340300151.

Watch Sterling Engineering Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sterling Engineering Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
236 NEW HARTFORD ROAD
City
BARKHAMSTED
State
CT
ZIP
06063
Mailing
PO BOX 559, WINSTED, CT 06098
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
50
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:  a)  At the facility - On or about - 2-6-15 - Employees were observed using fiberglass self-supporting ladders on slippery surfaces that were not equipped with rubber feet for proper support.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 6 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing hazards.   a)  At the Establishment - On or about - 2-06-15 - Employees were exposed to struck-by and crushed-by hazards from storage rack systems that were not labeled for the capacity of the system and were not secured to the floor to prevent collapse or over turning of the metal rack systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $0.00 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees.  a)  At the Facility - On or about 2-6-15 - Employee was exposed to crushed-by hazard by operating a Hyster 50 fork lift, S/N A216A04502X, without using the seat belt that was provided on the lift.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.184 E03 II

Serious Gravity 5 10 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(e)(3)(ii): Records of the most recent month in which each alloy steel chain sling was thoroughly inspected were not available for examination:   a)  At the facility - On or about 2-6-15 - Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards from steel chain slings used to lift aircraft parts that have not been inspected as verified by the most recent records.  Chain sling inspection records could not be provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3500.00 · Current $2100.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  a)  Milling & Finishing Area - On or about 2-6-15 - Employee was exposed to a amputation/severe laceration hazard from the unguarded section of the unused portion of the Wilton horizontal band saw blade.  b)  Giddings & Lewis Machine - On or about 2-6-15 - The area behind the machine where the part tables move was not guarded because the light curtain to stop access to the area was overridden by blocking the light beam on the system, creating a crushed-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100
  • — Z (S) $3500

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4900.00 · Current $2940.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  a)  At the facility - On or about 2-6-15 - Employees were exposed to amputation hazards from machines that had their interlocks disengaged allowing employees to access rotating parts with the door of the machines in the open position.  Disengaged interlocks on machine numbers, 1-79 Monarch, 6-27 and 6-28 Cincinnati Milacron and Giddings & Lewis Cell 4.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2940
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.212 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $4200.00 · Current $2520.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving:  a)  Milling and Finishing Area  - On or about 2-6-15 - Baldor Pedestal Grinder was not secured to the floor to prevent movement during use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4200

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2800.00 · Current $1680.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work:  a) Milling & Finishing Area - On or about 2-6-15 - Employees were exposed to laceration hazards from Baldor 1/2 hp, pedestal grinder that was used to finish aircraft parts which was not equipped with a tool rest.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

View STERLING ENGINEERING CORPORATION's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 340300151.